--- On Sun, 12/27/09, der Mouse <[email protected]> wrote:
> While I know it isn't true of me personally, I feel sure it
> is true of some fraction of IT-sec people (though I also
> suspect that fraction is quite small) but is it true of the
> industry? I don't know.
The numbers are IM(not)HO small enough that the point is irrelevant. Does the
industry "create viruses to create business" (as I have been asked innumerable
times)?
No.
> Organizations often exhibit epiphenomenal behaviour very
> different from and not directly traceable to the behaviours
> of the individuals making them up.
I think you have to stray into theology or at least philosophy to have a
realistic basis for this point. It's somewhere in the realm of "There is no
such thing as altruism, the Actor always performs the Act for their own selfish
purpose." Even if 'true' it makes no difference.
> Even if restricted to "the West", I doubt that's so; there
> are enough soldiers that I feel reasonably sure there are at
> least a few who really don't much care either way -
Same as above. (and "Hindmost" is capitalized... ;~)
> and
> substantially more, enough to speak of them as a fraction rather
> than a count of invidivuals, who just want him dead and justice (FWVO
> "justice") take the hindmost.
A smart grunt knows that - however much satisfaction there would be in shooting
bin Laden - having him die in a cell of advanced old age (after a few decades
on a heart-lung machine) is much better.
-chris
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
