John,
I've been talking some with Lee about this and my thought is that ideally
Fusedoc should have a way of declaring a template that an engine could use
to decode it. This would mean that we wouldn't be defining the precise
structure of Fusedoc but a Fusedoc meta-structure. An analogy might be XML
where the DTD defines the structure of a valid XML packet. This probably
sounds a bit weird, but the possibilities are very rich if we adopt this.
Obviously, a good deal of work has to be done.
-----Original Message-----
From: John Quarto-vonTivadar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 8:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Documentation System for Cold Fusion
Hal,
do you subscribe to the modified form of Fusedox that Lee seems to be using?
Either way works but in order to move the tool forward some of the Fusedoc
should stabilize. I just realized how usefull Lee's tool could be with some
expansions, yet I also have 8-10 complete sites already done in the "old"
(??) Fusedoc style (remember START FUSEDOC and END FUSEDOC )?
> Absolutely, Lee. I'll get it up there within the next day or so. I think
> what Lee did is excellent and I hope we can continue to evolve Fusedoc to
> where it does a good job of meeting everyone's needs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
the body.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
