Re: Documentation System for Cold Fusion

[John Quarto-vonTivadar]

Although all of my existing Fusedoc's are done in Hal's style, I do like the
potential in Fred's suggestions better. However I would not call
documentation towards variables "Attributes" as he does, since one would
want a list of all variables referenced within that template, which includes
APPLICATION, SESSION, CLIENT, and other scopes, whereas ATTRIBUTES would
apply only to those variables passed in. Instead, I would call Variables
"Variables" :) and then include the scope in the variable name. If omitted
it would be VARIABLES (ie, local) or ATTRIBUTES, depending on one's coding
styles.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or send a 
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.