No, I just think it looks clunky. I hear what you're saying, though and it
makes sense.
Hal Helms
== See ColdFusionTraining.com for info on "Best Practices with ColdFusion &
Fusebox" training ==
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Peters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 3:52 PM
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: Harness 1.04
On 11 Feb 2001, at 11:31, Hal Helms wrote:
> I like the single dash idea. Hmmm...sure, why not? We can just expand the
> spec so that it will work with either single or double dashes (same for
plus
> signs on global data).
It would easier on us tool-heads to expand the spec to include ==> than ->,
if
only because ==> keeps all the i/o indicators the same length. If the spec
says -->, ->, ++>, +>, <--, and <- are all valid (not to mention <-> and
+++),
then tools will have to extract the first three characters of an attribute
line, trim the result, and then check for validity. Is there some problem
with
==> and <== that I'm overlooking?
- Jeff
==============================================================
| Jeffrey S. Peters | "Specialization is for insects." |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | - Lazarus Long |
| PGP key for Jeffrey S. Peters at ldap://keyserver.pgp.com |
==============================================================
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
