For me, it would be #2. If I must fully qualify all of my calls to
fuseactions, I need to do that in every template (e.g., <FORM ACTION= ,
CFLOCATION, <A HREF=). If my nesting structure changes, then I'd have to
change each of those calls. Whereas with circuits.cfm, I'd only need to
change that one file.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick McElhaney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: April 2, 2001 10:04 AM
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: Nesting circuits: I just don't get it! :(
Maybe I'm asking the question the wrong way. Why DON'T you
just call a circuit by its fully qualified name?
1) Because you don't think it's possible (without
prohibitively complex code)?
2) Because there are DISADVANTAGES to using fully qualified
names?
3) Because there are ADVANTAGES to two part names?
4) Because it never occurred to you? (This is actually the
impression I get from reading Hal's XFB 101.)
Patrick
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
