Bob,
Why would your nesting structure change? Can you give me
an example or two?
Patrick
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Silverberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 10:32 AM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: RE: Nesting circuits: I just don't get it! :(
>
>
> For me, it would be #2. If I must fully qualify all of my calls to
> fuseactions, I need to do that in every template (e.g., <FORM ACTION= ,
> CFLOCATION, <A HREF=). If my nesting structure changes, then I'd have to
> change each of those calls. Whereas with circuits.cfm, I'd only need to
> change that one file.
>
> Bob
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick McElhaney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: April 2, 2001 10:04 AM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: RE: Nesting circuits: I just don't get it! :(
>
>
> Maybe I'm asking the question the wrong way. Why DON'T you
> just call a circuit by its fully qualified name?
>
> 1) Because you don't think it's possible (without
> prohibitively complex code)?
>
> 2) Because there are DISADVANTAGES to using fully qualified
> names?
>
> 3) Because there are ADVANTAGES to two part names?
>
> 4) Because it never occurred to you? (This is actually the
> impression I get from reading Hal's XFB 101.)
>
>
>
> Patrick
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
