I'll post my stats tool to fusebox.org tonight if you all will help me
improve it.
It does boring HTML bargraphs, but it's functional, and gives instant
gratification. i.e. no 2 hour parsing ala webtrends, it does a simple
SQL statement to obtain the graph. I could definitely use some help in
coming up with more reports.
It's built off of SQL Server 7 and may not work under other DBs, but I'm
sure it could be modified to do so.
Steve
Erik Voldengen wrote:
>
> Hey fellas. I'm sure this has already been brought up, but I
> can't find it.
>
> In my previous job, our clients used webtrends and livestats to look
> at visitor statistics. And while fusebox is horrible for showing
> individual fuseaction hits in stats applications, it's great for
> showing visitation to circuit applications.
>
> That was fine with the clients, because they could see that vistor A
> was in /PRODUCTS for 12 minutes, 2000 visitors hit /COMMUNITY/FORUM
> on X day, etc.
>
> But if we go with this nested architecture, then all stats will reflect
> one and only one page being hit, one zillion times a day. Is that
> right? This forces me (and probably some other people out there) to
> re-address the issue of statistics. I don't think having them pay me
> for a stats module in the backend is the best solution, especially
> when they like 3d graphs and such from canned stats applications.
>
> So I'll be the 1000th person to ask - what is Hal et all doing to
> accomodate this issue?
>
> -Erik
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick McElhaney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 9:09 AM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: RE: Nesting circuits: I just don't get it! :(
>
> > > But there are plenty of examples where people have been forced to
> > > rename circuits so that they don't conflict with existing circuits.
> > > So it would seem that the fully qualified method is more practical.
> >
> > I have yet to come across this problem at all, I simply create
> > another name
> > for the circuit in the Circuits.cfm file, and bam I'm done.
>
> Under my proposed method, you don't even have to change the
> circuits.cfm. No assembly required. Just drop it in and it works.
>
> So again, I pose the question. Why DON'T you just use the fully
> qualified fuseaction?
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
