Hello all. Here's a point I'm pondering and I hope to get your thought pennies.
When you compose a Fusebox site, it's likely you'll have a large number of essentially
static pages. They're nothing more than content to be displayed and read. In that
case, is it better to:
1) Stick to Fusebox. Create "dsp_" files and fuseactions for each page to display.
2) Do it the old fashioned way. Create standard pages and link directly to them. Use
Fusebox for site functions that merit it.
Now, let's say we have a compelling reason to make all pages of static content
dynamically generated. (We'll build a content management system to let Marketing make
their own little copy edits rather than bothering you.) In this case, is it better to:
1) Use a file-per-page method. Create "dsp_" plus whatever other appropriate files for
each page of content.
2) Use a page ID to generate a page. No physical file exists. The page ID pulls the
appropriate text for the page from the database.
I have my own answers. But I'll not spoil it by giving that away yet.
Tom Briscoe
Web Developer
Compass Bank
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
