RE: Handling Static and Dynamic Pages

[Ken Beard]

cfmodule, cfbodycontent, cffile OR cfhttp, cffile.

why pay?

At 12:11 PM 4/12/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Ok, we're getting a little closer to the core question here.  Do you stick 
>to Fusebox on "static" pages when it offers no other benefit but 
>consistency?  Or Fusebox only your "application" elements of a site?
>
>I've done the latter in practice but I'm a single man development group.  : )
>
>As to generating static pages from dynamic elements, that sounds like a 
>good idea.  I believe the Vignette StoryServer (a high priced content 
>management system if you're not familiar) uses that same method.
>
>Tom Briscoe
>Web Developer
>Compass Bank
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/fusebox@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists