RE: Handling Static and Dynamic Pages

[Roger B.]

> Ok, we're getting a little closer to the core question here.  Do
> you stick to Fusebox on "static" pages when it offers no other
> benefit but consistency?  Or Fusebox only your "application"
> elements of a site?

Tom,

For me, FB is an application thing... when it comes to relatively basic,
non-interactive content, it's easier to just use traditional content
management tools. Or even FB-based, non-traditional content management
tools, for that matter.


--
Roger




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/fusebox@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists