******************************* Team Allaire *******************************
I've done Fusebox and CFObjects, but not Smart Objects. CFObjects was a lot
of fun, as I come from the same background of Smalltalk as does its creator,
my friend, Ralph Fiol. If I were working all by myself, I would probably
adopt CFObjects. Its biggest drawback to me is the high level of expertise
that it requires of the coder.
Fusebox, on the other hand, is much simpler with no OO airs. It really
excels at team-oriented development and makes maintenance of a program
(typically 70-90% of the lifecycle cost of a program) so much easier. Its
biggest drawback from my POV is that it doesn't have the granularity of
reuse that CFObjects has.
Hal Helms
Team Allaire
[ See www.halhelms.com <http://www.halhelms.com> for info on training
classes ]
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Vincent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 1:21 AM
To: Fusebox
Subject: app frameworks
Concerning the discussion of Fusebox vs Smart Objects vs cfObjects...
Does anyone here actually have first-hand experience coding in each of these
frameworks???
Not reading the literature but ACTUAL coding experience??
I'm sure we would all love a comparison analysis of each model if you have.
Scott
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
