> Thats funny, I only use one ustom tag in my FuseBox applications, thats
> FormUrl2Attributes.
Russ,
I wasn't actually talking about the custom tags *inside* a Fusebox... that
was a reference to FB's ability to turn an entire application into a custom
tag and effectively repackage internal functions as external services for
other apps. That's really a wonderfully elegant way to reuse CF code, IMO.
> Just give up CFBODYCONTENT...
I'll probably never give up BODYCONTENT, myself... unless CFSAVECONTENT
turns out to be more flexible than it appears in the CF5 documentation. It's
an incredibly important part of my toolset at this point.
> You seem to be taking the shine off of what FuseBox really is by
> calling it
> "a wonderfully elegant mechanism for exposing the guts of entire
> applications to the world via the good ol' custom tag."
That definitely *would* be a minimization of FB's strengths... 'cept I
didn't call FB "a wondefully elegant mechanism". I said that it *provides*
one, and it does, as one of its many features.
--
Roger
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
