This is a great technique (using OO for the middle tier and
XFB for the front end), but I just don't think CF is
suited to do the whole job. Have you considered using servlets
instead of CFObjects? That way you can unleash the true powers
of OO, rather than clunky ol' CFObjects.
Patrick
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 11:08 PM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: RE: another nesting problem
>
>
> Couldn't agree more. I use cfobjects for my business logic and
> fusebox for,
> well basically everything else...and the marriage works very nicely.
> Honestly I am quite confident that I could write my own code to
> perform this
> using only FB (well I use XFB), but the cfobjects route adds a
> nice level of
> organization and mimics inheritance nicely.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russ Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 9:59 PM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: RE: another nesting problem
>
>
> Surely you cant think that the custom tag is an end all solution for code
> reuse of complex functionality?? That would be absurd.
>
> I am experimenting now with XFB and CFOBJECTS together in the
> same app. I am
> looking to se what works best with both. During the first round I
> am trying
> to allow FuseBox to be the overall application architecture and
> presentation
> architecture and using CFOBJECTS to handle all of the "back-end" server
> processing. So far it seems to be working together pretty well. Maybe a
> marriage of the two, allowing FuseBox to control the app flow and
> presentation layer stuff and CFOBJECTS to handle the back-end
> will be what I
> have been looking for.
>
> After all, there are many similarities in both of them anyways.
>
> Russ Johnson
> Manager
> Jacksonville ColdFusion Users Group
> Home (904)695-9500
> Mobile (904)465-1848
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Great thinkers have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre
> minds." --Albert Einstein
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 6:28 AM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: RE: another nesting problem
>
>
> > ...but imagine the time you could save when you are developing
> apps if you
> > could just call code that you have already written into some
> other circuit
> > and not have to worry about which header file to include or "do
> I need to
> > overwrite this variable that is being set in the other circuit?"!
>
> Russ,
>
> I already can, using a funky little technology called a "custom tag". [g]
>
>
> --
> Roger
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
