> I agree with you on most points. I'm not converting to Fusebox for
> speed increase. More portability and make my site more manageable so I
> can concentrate on adding cool features.
Exactly. So why are you benchmarking?
Whoa easy tiger! I'm just saying I'd contribute to the study since I'm
making the conversion anyway. :)
> PHP vs CF issue is retarded. I think a talented programmer on either
> side can accomplish relatively the same result...although I'd
> recommend CF over PHP for corporate environment ANYDAY for scalability
> concerns and cost in development.
I would love to use PHP for the project I'm working on now. Its much better
suited to the task. But I know I'm doing the company a favor by sticking
with Cold Fusion.
> CF 7.0? Hmm tough call...I believe by that time JSP tags will look A
> LOT like CF TAGS. ;-)
Actually you're not too far off. CF invented the whole tag concept, and JSP
improved upon it. LiveSoft (JRun) was the first (I think) of many to make a
collection of JSP custom tags that mimic Cold Fusion. Since CF 6.0 is going
to be built on top of J2EE, I assume by that point CF and JSP tags really
will be one and the same.
Patrick
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
