> > I agree with you on most points. I'm not converting to Fusebox for > > speed increase. More portability and make my site more manageable so I > > can concentrate on adding cool features. > Exactly. So why are you benchmarking? > > Whoa easy tiger! I'm just saying I'd contribute to the study since I'm > making the conversion anyway. :) Sorry 'bout that. Wasn't paying attention. I saw the movie Fight Club last night, and haven't quite bent my brain back into shape yet. :) Patrick ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
- Re: Why Benchmark? (An answer to Patric... Ken Wilson
- Re: Why Benchmark? (An answer to P... Judith Dinowitz
- RE: Why Benchmark? (An answer to Patric... Patrick McElhaney
- RE: Why Benchmark? (An answer to P... Hal Helms
- RE: Why Benchmark? (An answer to Patric... Scott Van Vliet
- RE: Why Benchmark? (An answer to Patrick) Patrick McElhaney
- RE: XFB Standardization/App Model Nathan Shaw
- Re: XFB Standardization/App Model Ken Wilson
- RE: Test of Fusebox vs. Non-Fusebox applications: Have t... Stacy Young
- RE: Test of Fusebox vs. Non-Fusebox applications: Have t... Stacy Young
- RE: Test of Fusebox vs. Non-Fusebox applications: H... Patrick McElhaney
- RE: Test of Fusebox vs. Non-Fusebox applications: Have t... McCollough, Alan
- RE: Test of Fusebox vs. Non-Fusebox applications: Have t... McCollough, Alan
