We have discussed applying the FB model to SheaHomes.com.
If we decide to go that route, I will be glad to Benchmark
the two version of the App (plain-CF and FB).
--> scott van vliet
<-- senior web engingeer
juxt interactive
949<>752<>5898<>202
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.juxtinteractive.com
"In uniqueness is the preservation
of mankind..." - Greg Graffin
-----Original Message-----
From: Hal Helms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 8:38 AM
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: Why Benchmark? (An answer to Patrick)
***************************** Team Allaire *****************************
I've been thinking about this and it seems to me we should take an
application that's already done in non-Fusebox and then rewrite it with
Fusebox. By doing this, we can avoid the argument that the non-Fusebox app
was a straw man, written in order to fail. Does anyone have access to any
non-trivial applications that are well-written and are not already
Fuseboxed?
-----Original Message-----
From: Judith Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 11:16 AM
To: Fusebox
Subject: Why Benchmark? (An answer to Patrick)
> > I agree with you on most points. I'm not converting to Fusebox for speed
> > increase. More portability and make my site more manageable so I can
> > concentrate on adding cool features.
> Exactly. So why are you benchmarking?
Look, we all agree that FB is a great methodology, or we wouldn't be here
and we wouldn't be supporting it.
So, you ask a good question: Why benchmark?
Wouldn't you like to have some scientific proof, some statistics to give to
people who nay-say FB? Also, wouldn't you like to be able to pinpoint which
parts of the FB methodology are faster and which may add a little time?
Maybe this way we can make the whole thing more efficient. We can continue
to refine the methodology.
The point of this is not to say "Plain CF is better" or "FB is better." The
point is to prove that one does not _lose_ significantly in processing speed
when converting to Fusebox. And if there are speed bottlenecks in the
process, let's pinpoint them and come up with solutions.
How many times have you heard someone say "FB has too much overhead!" Well,
let's prove them wrong. But let's make sure these tests are done well, and
look at this whole thing scientifically. I think the whole community will
benefit.
Judith
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
