I think a Fusebox FAQ is a great idea. I often use www.irt.org which has an
excellent JavaScript FAQ, often you will see the same or similar questions
answered in multiple ways, but this is a positive thing as you different
approaches to solving the problem. But all the answers are all there in a
logical format with a good search engine.
Perhaps the way forward to is use Fusewilki to gather FAQ(all can then
contribute) but then a 'Supreme Individual' to format the answers similar to
the FAQ in www.irt.org, just ensuring the wheat is sorted from the chaff
Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: Hal Helms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 June 2001 06:03
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: What is the difference between FuseBox and Extended FuseDoc?
Good point, Lee. No, I'm not setting myself up as Supreme Arbiter of the
Fusebox Standard. OK, let's try the wiki thing. Maybe, I'll be convinced
that it has more value than I presently do.
And stop replying to the HOF list!
-----Original Message-----
From: lee borkman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 11:01 PM
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: What is the difference between FuseBox and Extended
FuseDoc?
Hal,
The problem here is that Stacy's questions are not at the level likely to be
covered by any kind of FuseBox standard. Unless we recognise some
undisputed "authority" (you nominating?), then we will all have to settle
for a variety of answers, all with their advantages and disadvantages.
Some wise man once remarked "let a thousand flowers bloom" ;-) I don't
necessarily agree, as you know, but I am certainly resigned to the fact that
in a democratic community like this one we will always have multiple answers
to any question. If that's true, then I'd prefer a Wiki to a mailing list,
simply because it tends to be less "noisy" (no offence intended).
LeeBB.
>From: "Hal Helms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Doesn't that just compound the problem, Douglas? Stacy points out the
>problem is that there are TOO MANY ways of doing things for newbies--that
>they need a starting point from which they may later depart from. Wiki, it
>seems to me, is great for community collaboration, but horrible for
>establishing a standard. Or am I missing your point?
>
......
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
