Speaking as the person who published the book, and who worked very hard with Steve, Craig and Hal (and with some help from Nat) on that book, I would highly disagree that it was "very much crap," "unorganized, badly written." The subject is not Fusebox 3 but Fusebox 2. The book was written before all the major changes in the Fusebox.org site, when the specs were quite a mess, and before the current iteration of Fusebox. And I can't speak for the organization of the Fusebox book, but I don't believe the book we did was so unorganized and was not of high quality in content. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, of course -- but I'm sure a lot of you bought that first Fusebox book. Did you think so poorly of the book?
I would love to know who this is and where this is being discussed. Judith ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
