---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 1997 00:38:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fwd: Children's Defense Fund Report

Note--leaving children behind in times of "prosperity" is not MY idea of
family OR civic values!

Barb Chamberlain
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

In a message dated 97-10-03 19:26:56 EDT,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< *** BIG ECONOMIC GAINS LIFT VERY FEW CHILDREN  OUT OF 
 POVERTY ***
 
 This week, the Census Bureau's release of 1996 income and 
 poverty statistics reported a continued rise in the median 
 income in 1996, the fifth year of U.S. economic recovery. 
 The figures disappointingly showed that even while the 
 median income rose, child poverty rates for 1996 were 
 virtually unchanged. The rate of child poverty declined by 
 only three-tenths of one percent from 1995 to 1996 (from 
 20.8 percent to 20.5 percent) and actually rose slightly for 
 children in working families. Overall, there were 14.46 
 million children living in poverty in 1996, compared to 
 14.66 million children in 1995.  
 
 Moreover, the number of uninsured children up through and 
 including age 18 rose to 11.3 million in 1996, or 15.1 
 percent of all such children -- the largest numbers ever 
 recorded by the Census Bureau. "Many claims have been made 
 about families who have left welfare," said CDF President 
 Marian Wright Edelman.  "While far too little is known about 
 their children's well-being, today's data warn us that many 
 are failing to rise out of poverty, and, even worse, some 
 are losing their health coverage as well."  
 
 A number of other unfortunate records were set in this 
 year's poverty statistics: 
 
 * The number of poor families with children headed by 
 someone who worked during the year reached 3.6 million in 
 1996, higher than any year since 1975, when these data were 
 first available.
 
 * 69 percent of all poor children live in a family where 
 someone (not always the head of household) worked in 1996, 
 also a record high, and up from 61 percent as recently as 
 1993.
 
 * 1996 marked the first year on record in which Hispanic 
 children were the poorest racial/ethnic group of children.  
 Child poverty rates increased slightly for Hispanic and 
 White children (to 40.3 percent and 16.3 percent 
 respectively), while declining slightly for Black children 
 (to 39.9 percent).
 
 
 As the 1996 welfare law is implemented, increasing numbers 
 of  families with children are joining the ranks of the 
 working poor.  The Census data suggest that without 
 concerted action by business and government, children will 
 not only experience unrelieved poverty but are also likely 
 to lose health coverage.
 
 * For more information on the Census Bureau Report, contact:
 T'Wana Lucas at (202) 662-3542; 
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
 or visit the CDF Website at: <www.childrensdefense.org>. >>


---------------------
Forwarded message:
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 97-10-03 19:26:56 EDT

Children's Defense Fund Update
October 3, 1997
In this issue:
--Census Bureau Data
--New Child Health Insurance Program

--- Census Bureau Data ---

*** BIG ECONOMIC GAINS LIFT VERY FEW CHILDREN  OUT OF 
POVERTY ***

This week, the Census Bureau's release of 1996 income and 
poverty statistics reported a continued rise in the median 
income in 1996, the fifth year of U.S. economic recovery. 
The figures disappointingly showed that even while the 
median income rose, child poverty rates for 1996 were 
virtually unchanged. The rate of child poverty declined by 
only three-tenths of one percent from 1995 to 1996 (from 
20.8 percent to 20.5 percent) and actually rose slightly for 
children in working families. Overall, there were 14.46 
million children living in poverty in 1996, compared to 
14.66 million children in 1995.  

Moreover, the number of uninsured children up through and 
including age 18 rose to 11.3 million in 1996, or 15.1 
percent of all such children -- the largest numbers ever 
recorded by the Census Bureau. "Many claims have been made 
about families who have left welfare," said CDF President 
Marian Wright Edelman.  "While far too little is known about 
their children's well-being, today's data warn us that many 
are failing to rise out of poverty, and, even worse, some 
are losing their health coverage as well."  

A number of other unfortunate records were set in this 
year's poverty statistics: 

* The number of poor families with children headed by 
someone who worked during the year reached 3.6 million in 
1996, higher than any year since 1975, when these data were 
first available.

* 69 percent of all poor children live in a family where 
someone (not always the head of household) worked in 1996, 
also a record high, and up from 61 percent as recently as 
1993.

* 1996 marked the first year on record in which Hispanic 
children were the poorest racial/ethnic group of children.  
Child poverty rates increased slightly for Hispanic and 
White children (to 40.3 percent and 16.3 percent 
respectively), while declining slightly for Black children 
(to 39.9 percent).


As the 1996 welfare law is implemented, increasing numbers 
of  families with children are joining the ranks of the 
working poor.  The Census data suggest that without 
concerted action by business and government, children will 
not only experience unrelieved poverty but are also likely 
to lose health coverage.

* For more information on the Census Bureau Report, contact:
T'Wana Lucas at (202) 662-3542; 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
or visit the CDF Website at: <www.childrensdefense.org>.

---New Child Health Insurance Program---

*** STATES NEED TO KEEP MOVING  TO IMPLEMENT THE NEW CHILD 
HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM ***

The statistics in the rise on uninsured children issued by 
the Census Bureau this week underline the compelling need 
for states to move quickly to implement the new child health 
insurance program Congress passed this summer.  "Children in 
low-wage, working families with incomes too high for 
Medicaid -- exactly the group targeted by the recent child 
health bill -- are falling through the ever-widening hole in 
the employment-based insurance system," concluded Marian 
Wright Edelman.  "We call upon every Governor and state 
legislator to use the $4 billion a year in new child health 
grants to make sure these children get the health coverage 
they need to grow up healthy and strong."  The new child 
health law will cover children up through and including 18 
year olds.

A number of states are moving quickly to implement the new 
State Child Health Insurance Program, using the federal 
funding that was made available beginning October 1st.  The 
program gives states grants to provide health insurance for 
uninsured children in working families through expanded 
Medicaid or separate child health programs.

A Children's Defense Fund survey of 30 states' actions on 
child health implementation, through September 29th, 
provides the first national snap-shot of how states are 
implementing the new program.  The survey found several 
trends of note:

A number of states have adopted or proposed substantial 
early expansions of health coverage:             

* Numerous states plan to expand affordable, comprehensive 
coverage to uninsured children by building on existing 
programs.  In some states, state officials propose or plan 
to cover previously uninsured children through Medicaid, 
which provides the full range of services that children 
need, with low family costs. 

* A number of states have created task forces or working 
groups.  Certain states have established advisory groups to 
recommend approaches or describe options for implementing 
the federal legislation for uninsured children in families 
with incomes above the existing Medicaid levels.

* A few states have begun brand new programs.  Some states 
signed new programs into law that were passed during their 
regular legislative sessions and other states have proposed 
new programs or are currently developing programs. 

States differ in whether or not they plan to help the 
largest possible number of uninsured children:  

* Most states moving forward with specific proposals cover 
as many uninsured children as possible under the new law, 
generally reaching uninsured children with family incomes 
below $26,000 a year for a family of three (200 percent of 
the federal poverty level).  Others have so far proposed to 
help only some of those children.

A number of states, including several of the larger states, 
have not announced their plans or, at least publicly, given 
much indication of progress.  Some states may have already 
adopted large child health programs before passage of the 
new federal law.


** Contact your Governor's office, state agencies, and your 
state legislator's staff to find out the status of the new 
State Child Health Insurance Program in your state and 
encourage them to implement the new program as quickly as 
possible.

For more information on the new State Child Health Insurance 
Program and/or a chart detailing CDF survey results in all 
30 states visit the CDF Website at 
<www.chil,drensdefense.org>, write to
< [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, or contact the CDF Field 
Division at 202/628-8787.     
************************************************************
-- For more information on the Children's Defense Fund,  
visit our Web site at http://www.childrensdefense.org.

-- OUR STRENGTH IS IN OUR NUMBERS --
SHARE THIS LEGISLATIVE UPDATE WITH YOUR FRIENDS!!!

Our typical email is about a page or two long  and generally 
comes once a week. To join our legislative update email 
list,  sign-up on our website or send an email to: 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and  write in the body of the 
message:  subscribe cdfupdate <your email address>

PLEASE NOTE:  WHEN SUBSCRIBING OR UNSUBSCRIBING, PLEASE DO 
NOT SURROUND YOUR ADDRESS WITH BRACKETS.

For questions or comments, write or send an email to:

Kimberly Taylor
Children's Defense Fund
25 E Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001
202/662-3540 (fax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"What is done to children, they will do to society." --Karl 
Menninger







Reply via email to