From: Stephen Straker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> whom the laws are about. Thus the level of unreflected
>>> consciousness, which is one of the initial conditions
>>> of such laws, can be transformed
>> Jay: This is not science.
>
>Huh? What's so *un*-scientific about the observation that social
>scientific "laws" can be true at one time and false at another (later)
>time *just because* the knowledge of them renders them "inapplicable".
Scientific experiments are "reproducible". That is, the outcome
does not vary depending on the "unreflected consciousness" of the
animals involved.
Gosh, has anyone seen "unreflected consciousness"? <G>
What nonsense!
Jay
