There's another lesson to be learned here about "misunderstanding". I
understood Ed perfectly well and was pointing out that he called
the protocols "trumped up". I was also showing appreciation for the
additional information, that added context to Ed's description. It is easy
to be misinterpreted when one is being subtle or ironic. That's probably
why forgeries are successful -- they typically are devoid of subtly and
irony (unless one mistakes scorn for irony).
On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, jerome schatten wrote:
> Hey... let's get off Ed's case. He wasn't equating jews with a money and
> banking conspiracy or anything else. He was simply and ironically and
> subtly recalling past rhetoric as an example.
>
> If I, as an old jew, can understand what he's saying, surely you should
> be able to as well. Let's move on, eh?
Tom Walker
TimeWork Web
http://www.vcn.bc.ca/timework/worksite.htm
