Warning: this message contains irony and sarcasm!! (though I'm not sure of
where and in what proportions). They're all there, just as they were in Seattle, jumping up and down,
brandishing placards, getting dragged off by the cops, waving their arms in the
air, even taking off their clothing. Once again, the MNCs are the great enemy of
humanity, having corrupted the IMF and the World Bank, just as they had
corrupted the WTO in Seattle. Well, perhaps the protesters have a point; power
is power and those who hold power behave in their own interests. However, there is one point that the protesters are trying to make which I
rather wonder about. This has to do with the abolition of third world
sweatshops. While jumping up and down in Washington may accomplish this, there
may be simpler ways of going about it. One would be to simply subsidize that
part of the population of the third world which relies on sweatshops so that
people wouldn't have to work in them. If each of the protesters gave up the
money they now spend on clothes, some of the money they now spend on food, their
university tuition and other such items, this might go some distance toward
keeping young people in the third world out of sweatshops and in schools.
However, a lot might have to be given up if it was really going to make a
difference. Another solution might be to legislate an end to the kind of foreign
investment that creates sweatshops. Force Nike and GAP to make their clothes in
the United States. Protesters from the unions would like that. But if it were to
happen, you might not only have to subsidize displaced third world workers, you
might also have to subsidize American parents who have to buy clothes for their
kids. But then perhaps not. The poor kids could simply pick up the clothes
discarded by the kids who were able to afford to go to Washington or Seattle.
A third solution might be to open up rich world borders and let the people
from the sweatshops come in. I don't think protesters from the unions would go
for that. Nor would the high tech sector which might then have to pay software
designers $80K instead to the $4K they pay them in India. So, perhaps we are stuck with protesters jumping up and down, brandishing
placards, getting dragged off by the cops, waving their arms in the air, and
even taking off their clothing. Maybe that is the solution. Ed Weick |
- Re: Sweatshops Edward R Weick
- Re: Sweatshops Timework Web
- RE: Sweatshops Cordell . Arthur
- Re: Sweatshops Edward R Weick
- Re: Sweatshops Keith Hudson
- Re: Sweatshops Mike Hollinshead
- Re: Sweatshops Edward R Weick
- Re: Sweatshops Mike Hollinshead
- Re: Sweatshops Edward R Weick
- Re: Sweatshops Edward R Weick
- Re: Sweatshops Mike Hollinshead