Re: [Futurework] Possible U.S. cutbacks?

[Ed Weick]

I liked it better the way you said it the first time.  It was a very pleasant thought!   Ed ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 12:37 PM Subject: RE: [Futurework] Possible U.S. cutbacks? Ooops. Should have said.  Why not sell marijuana the same way we currently sell liqour in Ontario run liquour stores?  -----Original Message----- From: Cordell, Arthur: ECOM Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 12:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Futurework] Possible U.S. cutbacks? These are "weasel words."   Kucinich should show some real leadership.   Why not go all the way to decriminalization.  Have govt buy it and sell it and tax it.  As we do in Ontario run liquour stores.   Results?   Ensure quality.  Stop incarcerating youth.  Stop corrupting police officers.  Slow down organized crime.   Who benefits under the current system?  Drug dealers and corrupt officials.   arthur -----Original Message----- From: Darryl and Natalia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 10:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Futurework] Possible U.S. cutbacks? Just a thought on how the U.S may save some "expenses". Check the "Kucinich web site" http://www.kucinich.us/issues/marijuana_decrim.php   Of course, it would have to be a clear victory.   Darryl _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework