Harry Pollard claimed: > It wasn't an insult, it was a description. First it was supposed to be a joke, now a description. It's difficult to discuss with a troll. What part of "Zionazism" don't you understand ?
> However, let's forget it. "Forgive but don't forget." > What is your source for "Ford supplying cars &factories and > IBM supplying the "computers" for the camps." The US Treasury Department, i.a. See e.g. http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Corporations/Ford_Fuhrer.html http://www.IBMandtheHolocaust.com/ > Are you referring to before the US entered the war? Before and after. And btw, what matters is "after 1939", not "after 1941". And what's even more important is the U$ funding of the NSDAP, but that's another story. > Why do you rush past the 99% of trade which is of enormous > benefit to people in order to make a useless point about > some exchanges which are not. > > It's rather as if you would close down the supermarkets and > small grocery stores because some people are fencing stolen > goods. Actually, the negative sides of trade are anything but negligible. They (de)form societies and the planet in very bad ways. > Arms trading is almost totally within the province of > governments. So, maybe we should close down governments? It's not that simple at all. The biggest arms dealers are private entrepreneurs. But of course that doesn't fit your dogma, so you simply blame it on governments. > Actually, that might be a good idea. No, taking arms trading completely out of public control would certainly not be a good idea. It would lead to total "dog eat dog" -- but hey, that's what your FT ideology is about. Chris ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SpamWall: Mail to this addy is deleted unread unless it contains the keyword "igve". _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
