With the anticipation of a long awaited prince for a barren throne, the
Baker-Hamilton Commission aka Iraq Study Group is due to release its much
debated report on Wednesday. Much ink has been used analyzing whether this
will precipitate change in the White House’s war policy or just provide a
convenient stalling to do avoid immediate action. Inherently, an independent
commission’s report cannot be activated quickly and given the nature of this
White House to ignore, spin, stall and become invisible when it comes to
answers, we should expect no quick action beyond wordsmithing.

Arriving in mailboxes and on newsstands early this week, two national
magazines gaze into the tea leaves of our post Nov. 07 political
environment. Pres. Bush’s National Security Advisor, unaccustomedly grilled
by Meet The Press’ Tim Russert on Sunday about why the Bush43 administration
said one thing in public before the election but entirely different things
amongst themselves, promised that the Decider would respond “within weeks”.

If Pres. Bush is looking a wee bit weary and peevish these days, it’s not
because he’s worried about his offspring. One thing to remember in this
season of symbols is that the US has now been at war in Iraq longer than it
was in WW2, and we are nearing the dreaded 3,000 mark dead, indelibly linked
to the 9/11 loss of life in many minds. The official number of US troops
killed in Iraq is now 2892 (with 14 awaiting confirmation) as of yesterday,
Dec. 04. White House advisors are in more than seasonal holiday frenzy to
set the stage for the opening of Act II, Days of Reckoning, as the
performers, last minute rewrites and set designers prepare for the curtain
to rise on the 110th Congress after the New Year.

“The mission”, far from being accomplished, as been lost. Whether we are in
sync with Shakespeare’s Mac Beth or Richard III, or Dante’s Inferno, only
the last of the true believers still sing Springtime in Baghdad.

Newsweek’s Evan Thomas writes in So Now What, Mr. President?, “Persuading
Bush to listen - and to change course, even at the margins - will be very
difficult. One of the myths that the Bush camp has tried to perpetuate over
the years is that the president follows the model, learned as a student at
Harvard Business School, of a chief executive who delegates, listens to
advice and only then decides. Bush is the 'decider,' as he calls himself,
but there is little evidence that he listens to advice that he doesn't want
to hear. . . .

"The tone of Bush's senior aides, who were interviewed this week by
Newsweek, was dismissive, even condescending, toward Baker and the Iraq
Study Group. The word from the White House was not entirely Stay the Course,
but pretty close. . . . Bush may trim and fiddle here and there, say his
advisers, but he is determined to send a signal of unwavering
determination -- that he is in charge, and he will not abandon Iraq. . . .

"Bush seems determined to play the role of a 21st-century Winston Churchill,
steadfast in the West's darkest hour, when many Americans see Bush as the
captain on the bridge of the Titanic. But in fact the dire situation in
Iraq -- and the reality that there are no magical fixes -- may push the
president into listening to Baker and other advisers, if only for a moment,
and then maybe with only half an ear. At least that is what Baker, according
to those who know him, is hoping and maneuvering for -- a chance to get his
foot in the door of the Oval Office, to make one last pass at getting Bush
to make an attempt at true diplomacy in the Middle East."
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16013640/site/newsweek/
<http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16013640/site/newsweek/>

Time’s Michael Duffy put it this way in Can Bush Find An Exit?: "George Bush
has a history of long-overdue U-turns. He waited until he woke up, hungover,
one morning at age 40 before giving up booze cold. He fought the idea of a
homeland-security agency for eight months after 9/11 and then scampered
aboard and called it his idea. He dumped Donald Rumsfeld last month as
defense secretary, although lawmakers and even some generals had been
calling for his head since 2005. Bush's biggest reversals usually come after
months -- even years -- of stubborn resistance, when just about everyone has
given up on his having any second thoughts at all. That's always been the
point: he's a decider, he says, and deciders aren't supposed to undecide.
When he does have to Kojak the car and head down the street in the opposite
direction, he takes a little extra time getting it done.

"But Bush has never had to pull off a U-turn like the one he is
contemplating now: to give up on his dream of turning Babylon into an oasis
of freedom and democracy and instead begin a staged withdrawal from Iraq,
rewrite the mission of the 150,000 U.S. troops there as they begin to draw
down, and launch a diplomatic Olympics across the Middle East and between
Israel and the Palestinians. Even calling all that a reversal is a misnomer;
it would be more like a personality transplant.

"So it may take the 43rd president a little more time than it normally does
to execute this particular U-turn. And he will do all he can to make it look
more like a lane change. But sometime in the next month or so, Bush will
begin the biggest foreign policy course correction of his presidency. No
matter what else may get stapled onto it, the maneuver will be based on the
agreement reached by the bipartisan commission led by former Secretary of
State James Baker III and former Indiana Congressman Lee Hamilton."
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1565529,00.html
<http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1565529,00.html>

There is of course, much more to this story, and the third act is only in
draft form. In the meantime, the blood and treasury of many are spent, in a
futile, unnecessary tragedy, while this non-hero fiddles. In yet another
indication of the self-enclosed bubble that is the Bush43 presidency, the
Decider gave his first post Nov. 7 interview to a trusted PR enabler, Brit
Hume on Fox News, safety first.

One gets the feeling this is a fragile, terminally ill administration, close
to the end. One can only hope for clarity and courage in the present, with
less self-absorbed concentration on future legacy about the past.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to