I guess there will be no end to negative innovation.

I had not thought of this one, although, as often, once I become aware of it, it's trivially obvious.  Once again, the root issue is whether persons are "treated" as members of the community to which all things contribute, or as part of the things contributing to that community.  (My -- Habermasean -- definition of a community is not just an aggregation of living human bodies, but a conversation deciding the shape of the conversants' lives.)

I also had a more personal thought about this: working as a computer programmer, it would not be ethically neutral to be helping produce the software that enables this kind of changes in persons' lives.

A less material irony is that the article says the company making the software is "Kronos Inc."  Emphatically, Kronos Inc is changing the nature of time [kronos] for these persons, in deeper ways than just "scheduling", and the specific nuances of the time we live are basic and pervasive qualities of all our experience in living.

A question is whether and, if so, how this kind of new technology could be used in ways that would be beneficial to the workers (as well as for the customers and the enterprise).

  brad

         Wal-Mart Seeks New Flexibility In Worker Shifts
         3 January 2007
         The Wall Street Journal
         A1
         The nation's biggest private employer is about to revamp the  way it schedules its work force, in a move that could shake up many  employees' lives.

         Early this year, Wal-Mart Stores Inc., using a new  computerized scheduling system, will start moving many of its 1.3  million workers from predictable shifts to a system based on the  number of customers in stores at any given time. The move promises  greater productivity and customer satisfaction for the huge retailer  but could be a major headache for employees.

         The change is made possible by a software system that can  crunch an array of data, part of a shift toward computerized  management tools that can help pare costs and boost companies'  bottom lines. But it also could demand greater flexibility and  availability from workers in place of reliable work shifts -- and  predictable paychecks.


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to