On 5/11/2010 3:46 PM, Christoph Reuss wrote:
You have advocated (with URL) population reduction down to 100 Million
globally to save the climate (i.e. within a couple of decades)._Logic
mandates that this REQUIRES termination/liquidation -- in large numbers._
If you bothered to read the website, it explains precisely how OCPF (one
child per family -max) would do this. RPD is rapid population decline.
Again you put words in my mouth without researching the subject of the
website.
Forced population reduction MAXimizes
violent conflict.
Another fabrication with no experience with the subject. Incentives to
NOT breed are not force. Carrots, not sticks.
Above, you expressed certainty again...
For me to express certainty, I would have to use words like I quoted you
doing several times like I know... not opinion...... I did not do that.
I expressly stated ALL ALONG that my willingness to bet on my opinions
was based on probabilities as I judged them. You turned a few words of
mine into a claim that I was certain about the future. That is sophistry.
I like elegant technologies and will read the book. But I will bet that
over the next 20 years (my expected lifetime) mortality rates will rise,
average global health will decline, biodiversity will decline, pollution
will increase...despite all the technologies our plague species can invent.
This is my absolute last response to you.
Steve
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
