According to our myths, there have been seven previous worlds that slowly
evolved into this one.    Survivors from each world consisted of the one’s
who remembered the meanings of the Garden/Forest (web of all life and all
levels of existence)  and the reason for our being here.      A cloak of
protection was put around them and they carried the lessons into each next
world.    The current world is filled with forgetfulness and greed although
they have solved some things.    What is forgotten is that we exist in a
world that was dreamed earlier and are now dreaming the future.     This
future resembles the dreams of Lewis Carroll’s Mad Hatter and the Cherokee
Trickster the White Rabbit and their tea party.     It’s disturbing how it
all fits. 

 

REH

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of de Bivort
Lawrence
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 3:40 PM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Unemployed Over 50, Fears of Never Working Again

 

Hi, Ray,

If you have a moment, could you say more about the seven cycles you mention,
and what they are?

 

Many thanks,

 

Lawry

 

On Sep 21, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Ray Harrell wrote:





The system doesn’t work.   God!   I’m beginning to sound like a Swiss Gypsy.
But why in the dickens can’t anyone get this?  

 

The system cut out it’s eyes,  poked holes in its ears then stuck a burning
coal up its nose and Art went away in favor of commercial trinkets and trash
perceptivity.     All  for a buck and now it doesn’t know how to look  nor
where.   

 

We have a story about a pretty boy with perfect feathers on his headdress,
but a lousy forester, who coyote tricked into giving away his eyes for
flower eyes which could see through anything and spot the game,  but then
the flowers wilted and he was blind.    

 

But what the hell.   Just some dumb Indian story right?  Certainly not
Jevons or even Scottish.    But let’s be clear.    Numbers are not metaphor.
They are contractile reductions to a singularity.    You can’t expect growth
from a singularity without an explosion.    Metaphor on the other hand is
the perfect modality for examining systems.      Anyone ever heard or read
the European guys named George Lakoff or Robert Sternberg, or Robert Frank?


 

Meanwhile British Columbia, the most liberal and green of all of the
provinces,  is going to destroy a sacred lake and a tradition of thousands
of years just for a buck.    Go figure.    

 

Will the little brothers ever learn?   That’s why they got kicked out of the
garden in the first place.    Even their Bible, New Testament,  Korans and
books of Mormon  tells the story but they refused to admit that that Adam’s
big brother was left behind to care for the garden.     Their metaphor is
that the garden has to collapse in order for humans to advance. (The tree of
“knowledge?”   But it was just the tree of sex and violence and technology
as a substitute for the development of the human instrument.   A recipe for
human laziness and the idle rich.)      

 

Last night I read a prophecy from my old teacher.   I hadn’t read it before.
He said that the world of the present had already been dreamed and that the
human spirit world had collapsed in the dream and the material world would
soon follow in a great cleansing to make way for the next life and age.
He also said that it probably would be another species.    The Creator had
completed the seven cycles with this species and they failed to measure up.

 

REH

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Cordell
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 12:41 PM
To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
Subject: [Futurework] Unemployed Over 50, Fears of Never Working Again

 

September 19, 2010  NY Times


For the Unemployed Over 50, Fears of Never Working Again


By MOTOKO RICH
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/r/motoko_rich/in
dex.html?inline=nyt-per> 


VASHON ISLAND, Wash. — Patricia Reid is not in her 70s, an age when many
Americans continue to work. She is not even in her 60s. She is just 57. 

But four years after losing her job she cannot, in her darkest moments,
escape a nagging thought: she may never work again. 

College educated, with a degree in business administration, she is
experienced, having worked for two decades as an internal auditor and
analyst at Boeing
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/boeing_company/index.
html?inline=nyt-org>  before losing that job. 

But that does not seem to matter, not for her and not for a growing number
of people in their 50s and 60s who desperately want or need to work to pay
for retirement and who are starting to worry that they may be discarded from
the work force — forever. 

Since the economic collapse, there are not enough jobs being created for the
population as a whole, much less for those in the twilight of their careers.


Of the 14.9 million unemployed, more than 2.2 million are 55 or older.
Nearly half of them have been unemployed six months or longer, according to
the Labor Department. The unemployment rate in the group — 7.3 percent — is
at a record, more than double what it was at the beginning of the latest
recession
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/r/recession_an
d_depression/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier> . 

After other recent downturns, older people who lost jobs fretted about how
long it would take to return to the work force and worried that they might
never recover their former incomes. But today, because it will take years to
absorb the giant pool of unemployed at the economy’s recent pace, many of
these older people may simply age out of the labor force before their luck
changes. 

For Ms. Reid, it has been four years of hunting — without a single job
offer. She buzzes energetically as she describes the countless applications
she has lobbed through the Internet, as well as the online courses she is
taking to burnish her software skills. 

Still, when she is pressed, her can-do spirit falters. 

“There are these fears in the background, and they are suppressed,” said Ms.
Reid, who is now selling some of her jewelry and clothes online and is late
on some credit card payments. “I have had nightmares about becoming a bag
lady,” she said. “It could happen to anyone. So many people are so close to
it, and they don’t even realize it.” 

Being unemployed at any age can be crushing. But older workers suspect their
résumés often get shoved aside in favor of those from younger workers.
Others discover that their job-seeking skills — as well as some technical
skills sought by employers — are rusty after years of working for the same
company. 

Many had in fact anticipated working past conventional retirement ages to
gird themselves financially for longer life spans, expensive health care and
reduced pension guarantees. 

The most recent recession has increased the need to extend working life.
Home values, often a family’s most important asset, have been battered.
Stock portfolios are only now starting to recover. According to a Gallup
poll in April, more than a third of people not yet retired plan to work
beyond age 65, compared with just 12 percent in 1995. 

Older workers who lose their jobs could pose a policy problem if they lose
their ability to be self-sufficient. “That’s what we should be worrying
about,” said Carl E. Van Horn, professor of public policy and director of
the John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development at Rutgers University
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/r/rutgers
_the_state_university/index.html?inline=nyt-org> , “what it means to this
class of the new unemployables, people who have been cast adrift at a very
vulnerable part of their career and their life.” 

Forced early retirement imposes an intense financial strain, particularly
for those at lower incomes. The recession and its aftermath have already
pushed down some older workers. In figures released last week by the Census
Bureau
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/c/census_
bureau/index.html?inline=nyt-org> , the poverty rate among those 55 to 64
increased to 9.4 percent in 2009, from 8.6 percent in 2007. 

But even middle-class people who might skate by on savings or a spouse’s
income are jarred by an abrupt end to working life and to a secure
retirement. 

“That’s what I spent my whole life in pursuit of, was security,” Ms. Reid
said. “Until the last few years, I felt very secure in my job.” 

As an auditor, Ms. Reid loved figuring out the kinks in a manufacturing or
parts delivery process. But after more than 20 years of commuting across
Puget Sound to Boeing, Ms. Reid was exhausted when she was let go from her
$80,000-a-year job. 

Stunned and depressed, she sent out résumés, but figured she had a little
time to recover. So she took vacations to Turkey and Thailand with her
husband, who is a home repairman. She sought chiropractic treatments for a
neck injury and helped nurse a priest dying of cancer. 

Most of her days now are spent in front of a laptop, holed up in a
lighthouse garret atop the house that her husband, Denny Mielock, built in
the 1990s on a breathtaking piece of property overlooking the sound. 

As she browses the job listings that clog her e-mail in-box, she refuses to
give in to her fears. “If I let myself think like that all the time,” she
said, “I could not even bear getting out of bed in the morning.” 

With her husband’s home repair business pummeled by the housing downturn,
the bills are mounting. Although the couple do not have a mortgage on their
3,000-square-foot house, they pay close to $7,000 a year in property taxes.
The roof is leaking. Their utility bills can be $300 a month in the winter,
even though they often keep the thermostat turned down to 50 degrees. 

They could try to sell their home, but given the depressed housing market,
they are reluctant. 

“We are circling the drain here, and I am bailing like hell,” said Ms. Reid,
emitting an incongruous cackle, as if laughter is the only response to her
plight. “But the boat is still sinking.” 

It is not just the finances that have destabilized her life. 

Her husband worries that she isolates herself and that she does not
socialize enough. “We’ve both been hard workers our whole lives,” said Mr.
Mielock, 59. Ms. Reid sometimes rose just after 3 a.m. to make the hourlong
commute to Boeing’s data center in Bellevue and attended night school to
earn a master’s in management information systems. 

“A job is more than a job, you know,” Mr. Mielock said. “It’s where you fit
in society.” 

Here in the greater Seattle area, a fifth of those claiming extended
unemployment benefits are 55 and older. 

To help seniors polish their job-seeking skills, WorkSource, a local
consortium of government and nonprofit groups, recently began offering
seminars. On a recent morning, 14 people gathered in a windowless conference
room at a local community college to get tips on how to age-proof their
résumés and deflect questions about being overqualified. 

Motivational posters hung on one wall, bearing slogans like “Failure is the
path of least persistence.” 

Using PowerPoint slides, Liz Howland, the chipper but no-nonsense session
leader, projected some common myths about older job-seekers on a screen:
“Older workers are less capable of evaluating information, making decisions
and problem-solving” or “Older workers are rigid and inflexible and have
trouble adapting to change.” 

Ms. Howland, 61, ticked off the reasons those statements were inaccurate.
But a clear undercurrent of anxiety ran through the room. “Is it really true
that if you have the energy and the passion that they will overlook the age
factor?” asked a 61-year-old man who had been laid off from a furniture
maker last October. 

Gallows humor reigned. As Ms. Howland — who suggested that applicants remove
any dates older than 15 years from their résumé — advised the group on how
to finesse interview questions like “When did you have the job that helped
you develop that skill?” one out-of-work journalist deadpanned: “How about
‘during the 20th century?’ ” 

During a break, Anne Richard, who declined to give her age, confessed she
was afraid she would not be able to work again after losing her contract as
a house director at a University of Washington
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/u/univers
ity_of_washington/index.html?inline=nyt-org>  sorority in June. Although she
had 20 years of experience as an office clerk in Chattanooga, Tenn., she
feared her technology skills had fallen behind. 

“I don’t feel like I can compete with kids who have been on computers all
their lives,” said Ms. Richard, who was sleeping on the couch of a couple
she had met at church and contemplating imminent homelessness. 

Older people who lose their jobs take longer to find work. In August, the
average time unemployed for those 55 and older was slightly more than 39
weeks, according to the Labor Department, the longest of any age group. That
is much worse than in August 1983, also after a deep recession, when someone
unemployed in that age group spent an average of 27.5 weeks finding work. 

At this year’s pace of an average of 82,000 new jobs a month, it will take
at least eight more years to create the 8 million positions lost during the
recession. And that does not even allow for population growth. 

Advocates for the elderly worry that younger people are more likely to fill
the new jobs as well. 

“I do think the longer someone is out of work, the more employers are going
to question why it is that someone hasn’t been able to find work,” said Sara
Rix, senior strategic policy adviser at AARP
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/a/aarp/in
dex.html?inline=nyt-org> , the lobbying group for seniors. “Their skills
have atrophied for one thing, and technology changes so rapidly that even if
nothing happened to the skills that you have, they may become increasingly
less relevant to the jobs that are becoming available.” 

In four years of job hunting, Ms. Reid has discovered that she is no longer
technologically proficient. In one of a handful of interviews she has
secured, for an auditing position at the Port of Seattle, she learned that
the job required skills in PeopleSoft, financial software she had never
used. She assumes that deficiency cost her the job. 

Ms. Reid is still five years away from being eligible for Social Security
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/s/social_secur
ity_us/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier> . But even then, she would be
drawing early, which reduces monthly payments. Taking Social Security at 62
means a retiree would receive a 25 percent lower monthly payout than if she
worked until 66. 

Ms. Reid is in some ways luckier than others. Boeing paid her a six-month
severance, and she has health care benefits that cover her and her husband
for $40 a month. 

And she admits some regrets: she had a $180,000 balance in her 401(k)
<http://topics.nytimes.com/your-money/retirement/401ks-and-similar-plans/ind
ex.html?inline=nyt-classifier>  account, and paid $80,000 in penalties and
taxes when she cashed it out early. She did not rein in her expenses right
away. And now, her $500-a-week unemployment benefits have been exhausted. 

She has since cut back, forgoing Nordstrom
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/nordstrom_inc/index.h
tml?inline=nyt-org>  shopping sprees and theater subscriptions, but also
cutting out red meat at home and putting off home repairs. 

In order to qualify for accounting posts, she is taking an online training
course in QuickBooks, a popular accounting software used by small
businesses. She recently signed up for a tax course at an H
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/h_and_r_block_inc/ind
ex.html?inline=nyt-org> &R Block tax preparation office in Seattle. 

And she is plugging ahead with her current plan: to send out 600
applications to accounting firms in the area, offering her services for the
next tax season. Eventually, she wants to open her own business. 

With odd jobs and her husband’s — albeit shriveled — earnings, she could
stagger along. For now, she stitches together an income by gardening for
neighbors, helping fellow church members with their computers, and
participating in Internet surveys for as little as $5 apiece. 

“You don’t necessarily have to go through the door,” Ms. Reid said. “You can
go around it and go under it. I can be very creative. I think that I will
eventually manage to pull this together.” 

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to