Frank sent me over to the composers site where this was posted.
La Migra <http://nicomuhly.com/news/2010/la-migra/> from Friday, September3rd of the year2010. So! Did everybody read this <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/04/arts/music/04stein.html?_r=1> weird thing in the Times? Synopsis: a slightly elderly (72 years old) fabulous German director was meant to do a production of Boris Gudunov up at the Met. He had Work Permit Issues. He was mocked at the US Consulate in Germany. He basically had a emotional pissing contest wherein the following came to pass: Several weeks later he returned and managed to gain the work visa, helped by a Met employee who had flown to Berlin. But the experience rankled, and Mr. Stein sent an e-mail to Mr. Gelb saying he was terrified and demotivated out of fear that a similar incident could occur in the United States. If anything happens in the same way, I will leave immediately your country trembling alone thinking of the entrance procedures at the airport, he said. Now. I work a lot abroad. I have a lot of foreign friends who work here. Its a nightmare; theres very little you can do to have it not be a nightmare: no amount of money, no weird bribery, it doesnt matter how fancy your sponsoring organization is. Its a nightmare for everybody. Isnt M.I.A., like, not allowed here? Valgeir Sigurðsson, who is like, cartoonishly gentle and honest and lovely, was once Physically Deported from the country 8 hours before a show he and I were meant to play together in Minneapolis. Shit happens. Every time I go up into England, a conversation happens like this: Why are you here? Im a composer. Are you composing while youre here? No. Im hearing a piece I wrote get played. Is that work? No. Its scary. Ive been put in windowless rooms for hours. But theres something irritating about this Peter Stein business, because, sweetie, imagine what it would be like if you were an Arab? And carrying hard drives? Its disappointing that when presented with a fun 1-page exposé in the Times, homegirl keeps the conversation rooted in his own private emotional drama. Plus also, its not like you can get right back on the plane and make a dramatic euro exit. If you land in the states at like, 2 or 3, you have to schlep back up the ramp, then lurk at the Sbarro for four hours until another flight leaves to Europe. Its hardly glamorous. I should think its much more glamorous to confront the Immigration Officer with a Calm, Assertive <http://www.cesarsway.com/> Politeness <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quentin_Crisp> , suffer your indignities, and take the car service to the Met. One time, after a particularly aggressive and insane entrance interview at Heathrow, the woman told me that her younger brother was an oboe player and that he was auditioning for the Royal Scottish National Orchestra and the situation was neutraliz(s)ed and I think on her often despite our rocky beginningz. Is it weirdly East Coast Leftie that every time Im detained, I think, it must be so much worse for other people? I saw a woman in full hijab get insensitively frisked in front of her daughter in Terminal 4 of JFK. I saw a 9 year old Pakistani boy have his entire Harry Potter backpack searched in Heathrow while he and his twin brother wept bitterly. I have seen some shit in Paris that would make your toes curl. Has anybody ever been to Russia!? A few months ago, I wrote a blog post <http://nicomuhly.com/news/2010/frustration-pageant/> about how hard it was for me to get a phone in England. Short story: without an English bank, you cant get a registered address (and vice versa) and if you try to pay with a foreign card, you have to go through an unreal phone tree and basically you just cant do it. Ive got an organist paying my phone bills now. And one of the points that I tried to make was: I am a middle-class white English-speaking person. Imagine going through the phone drama under the aegis of any other subject position. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Keith Hudson Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 2:06 PM To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION Subject: Re: [Futurework] Unemployed Over 50, Fears of Never Working Again Nothing in the article is of any surprise. One feels deeply sorry for all those over 50 -- and even over 40 -- who are out of work. It's highly likely that most of them will never have a full-time job again. But even if the advanced governments do the decent thing and offer some halfway reasonable welfare then governments will have something far more serious to worry about. This will be the accumulation of jobless young people, particularly young males and of increasingly educated and competent males also -- those who expected to move smoothly into well-paid jobs after university. At any age up to about 30, while their frontal lobes are still developing, they are very impressionable and many can be captured easily by extremist beliefs. Think IRA, think Saudi Arabian 9/11ers, think of terrorists and revolutionaries throughout history. But, of course, governments won't be thinking about this just yet. They'll be assuming . . . hoping . . . hoping . . . that the aftermath of the credit crunch won't last for more than a year or two until some financial wheeze or other will rescues them. Keith At 12:40 21/09/2010 -0400, you wrote: September 19, 2010 NY Times For the Unemployed Over 50, Fears of Never Working Again By MOTOKO <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/r/motoko_rich/in dex.html?inline=nyt-per> RICH VASHON ISLAND, Wash. Patricia Reid is not in her 70s, an age when many Americans continue to work. She is not even in her 60s. She is just 57. But four years after losing her job she cannot, in her darkest moments, escape a nagging thought: she may never work again. College educated, with a degree in business administration, she is experienced, having worked for two decades as an internal auditor and analyst at Boeing <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/boeing_company/index. html?inline=nyt-org> before losing that job. But that does not seem to matter, not for her and not for a growing number of people in their 50s and 60s who desperately want or need to work to pay for retirement and who are starting to worry that they may be discarded from the work force forever. Since the economic collapse, there are not enough jobs being created for the population as a whole, much less for those in the twilight of their careers. Of the 14.9 million unemployed, more than 2.2 million are 55 or older. Nearly half of them have been unemployed six months or longer, according to the Labor Department. The unemployment rate in the group 7.3 percent is at a record, more than double what it was at the beginning of the latest recession <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/r/recession_an d_depression/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier> . After other recent downturns, older people who lost jobs fretted about how long it would take to return to the work force and worried that they might never recover their former incomes. But today, because it will take years to absorb the giant pool of unemployed at the economys recent pace, many of these older people may simply age out of the labor force before their luck changes. For Ms. Reid, it has been four years of hunting without a single job offer. She buzzes energetically as she describes the countless applications she has lobbed through the Internet, as well as the online courses she is taking to burnish her software skills. Still, when she is pressed, her can-do spirit falters. There are these fears in the background, and they are suppressed,said Ms. Reid, who is now selling some of her jewelry and clothes online and is late on some credit card payments. I have had nightmares about becoming a bag lady,she said. It could happen to anyone. So many people are so close to it, and they dont even realize it. Being unemployed at any age can be crushing. But older workers suspect their résumés often get shoved aside in favor of those from younger workers. Others discover that their job-seeking skills as well as some technical skills sought by employers are rusty after years of working for the same company. Many had in fact anticipated working past conventional retirement ages to gird themselves financially for longer life spans, expensive health care and reduced pension guarantees. The most recent recession has increased the need to extend working life. Home values, often a familys most important asset, have been battered. Stock portfolios are only now starting to recover. According to a Gallup poll in April, more than a third of people not yet retired plan to work beyond age 65, compared with just 12 percent in 1995. Older workers who lose their jobs could pose a policy problem if they lose their ability to be self-sufficient. Thats what we should be worrying about,said Carl E. Van Horn, professor of public policy and director of the John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development at Rutgers <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/r/rutgers _the_state_university/index.html?inline=nyt-org> University, what it means to this class of the new unemployables, people who have been cast adrift at a very vulnerable part of their career and their life. Forced early retirement imposes an intense financial strain, particularly for those at lower incomes. The recession and its aftermath have already pushed down some older workers. In figures released last week by the Census <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/c/census_ bureau/index.html?inline=nyt-org> Bureau, the poverty rate among those 55 to 64 increased to 9.4 percent in 2009, from 8.6 percent in 2007. But even middle-class people who might skate by on savings or a spouses income are jarred by an abrupt end to working life and to a secure retirement. Thats what I spent my whole life in pursuit of, was security,Ms. Reid said. Until the last few years, I felt very secure in my job. As an auditor, Ms. Reid loved figuring out the kinks in a manufacturing or parts delivery process. But after more than 20 years of commuting across Puget Sound to Boeing, Ms. Reid was exhausted when she was let go from her $80,000-a-year job. Stunned and depressed, she sent out résumés, but figured she had a little time to recover. So she took vacations to Turkey and Thailand with her husband, who is a home repairman. She sought chiropractic treatments for a neck injury and helped nurse a priest dying of cancer. Most of her days now are spent in front of a laptop, holed up in a lighthouse garret atop the house that her husband, Denny Mielock, built in the 1990s on a breathtaking piece of property overlooking the sound. As she browses the job listings that clog her e-mail in-box, she refuses to give in to her fears. If I let myself think like that all the time,she said, I could not even bear getting out of bed in the morning. With her husbands home repair business pummeled by the housing downturn, the bills are mounting. Although the couple do not have a mortgage on their 3,000-square-foot house, they pay close to $7,000 a year in property taxes. The roof is leaking. Their utility bills can be $300 a month in the winter, even though they often keep the thermostat turned down to 50 degrees. They could try to sell their home, but given the depressed housing market, they are reluctant. We are circling the drain here, and I am bailing like hell,said Ms. Reid, emitting an incongruous cackle, as if laughter is the only response to her plight. But the boat is still sinking. It is not just the finances that have destabilized her life. Her husband worries that she isolates herself and that she does not socialize enough. Weve both been hard workers our whole lives,said Mr. Mielock, 59. Ms. Reid sometimes rose just after 3 a.m. to make the hourlong commute to Boeings data center in Bellevue and attended night school to earn a masters in management information systems. A job is more than a job, you know,Mr. Mielock said. Its where you fit in society. Here in the greater Seattle area, a fifth of those claiming extended unemployment benefits are 55 and older. To help seniors polish their job-seeking skills, WorkSource, a local consortium of government and nonprofit groups, recently began offering seminars. On a recent morning, 14 people gathered in a windowless conference room at a local community college to get tips on how to age-proof their résumés and deflect questions about being overqualified. Motivational posters hung on one wall, bearing slogans like Failure is the path of least persistence. Using PowerPoint slides, Liz Howland, the chipper but no-nonsense session leader, projected some common myths about older job-seekers on a screen: Older workers are less capable of evaluating information, making decisions and problem-solvingor Older workers are rigid and inflexible and have trouble adapting to change. Ms. Howland, 61, ticked off the reasons those statements were inaccurate. But a clear undercurrent of anxiety ran through the room. Is it really true that if you have the energy and the passion that they will overlook the age factor?asked a 61-year-old man who had been laid off from a furniture maker last October. Gallows humor reigned. As Ms. Howland who suggested that applicants remove any dates older than 15 years from their résumé advised the group on how to finesse interview questions like When did you have the job that helped you develop that skill?one out-of-work journalist deadpanned: How about during the 20th century? During a break, Anne Richard, who declined to give her age, confessed she was afraid she would not be able to work again after losing her contract as a house director at a University <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/u/univers ity_of_washington/index.html?inline=nyt-org> of Washington sorority in June. Although she had 20 years of experience as an office clerk in Chattanooga, Tenn., she feared her technology skills had fallen behind. I dont feel like I can compete with kids who have been on computers all their lives,said Ms. Richard, who was sleeping on the couch of a couple she had met at church and contemplating imminent homelessness. Older people who lose their jobs take longer to find work. In August, the average time unemployed for those 55 and older was slightly more than 39 weeks, according to the Labor Department, the longest of any age group. That is much worse than in August 1983, also after a deep recession, when someone unemployed in that age group spent an average of 27.5 weeks finding work. At this years pace of an average of 82,000 new jobs a month, it will take at least eight more years to create the 8 million positions lost during the recession. And that does not even allow for population growth. Advocates for the elderly worry that younger people are more likely to fill the new jobs as well. I do think the longer someone is out of work, the more employers are going to question why it is that someone hasnt been able to find work,said Sara Rix, senior strategic policy adviser at AARP <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/a/aarp/in dex.html?inline=nyt-org> , the lobbying group for seniors. Their skills have atrophied for one thing, and technology changes so rapidly that even if nothing happened to the skills that you have, they may become increasingly less relevant to the jobs that are becoming available. In four years of job hunting, Ms. Reid has discovered that she is no longer technologically proficient. In one of a handful of interviews she has secured, for an auditing position at the Port of Seattle, she learned that the job required skills in PeopleSoft, financial software she had never used. She assumes that deficiency cost her the job. Ms. Reid is still five years away from being eligible for Social <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/s/social_secur ity_us/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier> Security. But even then, she would be drawing early, which reduces monthly payments. Taking Social Security at 62 means a retiree would receive a 25 percent lower monthly payout than if she worked until 66. Ms. Reid is in some ways luckier than others. Boeing paid her a six-month severance, and she has health care benefits that cover her and her husband for $40 a month. And she admits some regrets: she had a $180,000 balance in her 401(k) <http://topics.nytimes.com/your-money/retirement/401ks-and-similar-plans/ind ex.html?inline=nyt-classifier> account, and paid $80,000 in penalties and taxes when she cashed it out early. She did not rein in her expenses right away. And now, her $500-a-week unemployment benefits have been exhausted. She has since cut back, forgoing Nordstrom <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/nordstrom_inc/index.h tml?inline=nyt-org> shopping sprees and theater subscriptions, but also cutting out red meat at home and putting off home repairs. In order to qualify for accounting posts, she is taking an online training course in QuickBooks, a popular accounting software used by small businesses. She recently signed up for a tax course at an H <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/h_and_r_block_inc/ind ex.html?inline=nyt-org> &R Block tax preparation office in Seattle. And she is plugging ahead with her current plan: to send out 600 applications to accounting firms in the area, offering her services for the next tax season. Eventually, she wants to open her own business. With odd jobs and her husbands albeit shriveled earnings, she could stagger along. For now, she stitches together an income by gardening for neighbors, helping fellow church members with their computers, and participating in Internet surveys for as little as $5 apiece. You dont necessarily have to go through the door,Ms. Reid said. You can go around it and go under it. I can be very creative. I think that I will eventually manage to pull this together. _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework Keith Hudson, Saltford, England
_______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
