The USA went through this issue in my parent's generation.    After the
depression the families broke up to move to the corners of the nation to
work.    People like my parents, basically put the money aside for them to
not have to depend upon the children financially.    What that did was to
free the children to go to work in situations like the Arts which are very
fragile economically and which the nation doesn't support in the private
market.   But of course the Artists are now like Chinese parents with little
capital, no retirement, an iffy medical situation and a predatory congress
that wants to cut elderly benefits "for the children's sake."     Meanwhile
the GOP and the Evangelicals also have no discipline when it comes to birth
rate.   They are against birth control and abortion but have no answer when
it comes to how these people will live or support their immense families
with a good education or them in their old age.   This is the ticking time
bomb that the tea party and the GOP are ignoring and that the Democrats are
too cowardly to address.    Anyway, this is the Chinese Government's answer.
At the end of the article are comments from around the world to the story. 

 

REH

 

 

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Keith Hudson
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 4:29 AM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] China law to make children visit parents

 

At 13:48 06/01/2011 -0800, Mike Gurstein wrote:



http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-12130140


But not only to visit parents but to care for them mentally and physically
we learn!

Now that China is copying its way, technologically, into Western
consumerism, it is also discovering our fault lines -- including
governmental inadequacy (and ineptitude) in coping with welfare for the old
and the needy.  The Confucian duty of caring for one's parents was fine with
multi-generational families on their own plots in older times, and when 95%
of the population hardly stirred more than 5 miles from their places of
birth. 

It is rather reminiscent of Tudor England when the same phenomenon was
occurring -- when young adults started forsaking their parents in the
countryside and migrated into the new townships even if they couldn't find
work there. In those days, by a decree of 1536, their ears were cut off.
(More exactly, one ear was cut off. If they remained without a job or didn't
return to their parents, the other ear was cut off.  If they still
persisted, they were executed.) It was a short-lived policy, however, and
the butchery disappeared within a generation.

So, I suspect, will China's neoConfucian proposal.

Keith  




Keith Hudson, Saltford, England http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/
<http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/2010/12/> 2011/01/
<http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/2010/12/> 
  

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to