The issue is, as I mentioned in my earlier
<http://gurstein.wordpress.com/2010/12/13/some-thoughts-on-community-informa
tics-in-china/> blog post what they call in China 1 to 6... Which is that
the one child policy (combined with increasing life spans) means that one
off-spring is now potentially responsible for 6 retirees--parents plus two
sets of grandparents.  It is seen as a major problem for the very rapidly
upcoming future. That combined with very rapid urbanization (leaving the
older folks behind in the villages) is a potentially quite explosive set of
social issues...
 
The one child policy has recently been reconfirmed I believe, so the issue
isn't going to go away at least for a couple of more decades but rather
likely to become more acute.
 
Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Keith Hudson
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 1:29 AM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] China law to make children visit parents


At 13:48 06/01/2011 -0800, Mike Gurstein wrote:


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-12130140


But not only to visit parents but to care for them mentally and physically
we learn!

Now that China is copying its way, technologically, into Western
consumerism, it is also discovering our fault lines -- including
governmental inadequacy (and ineptitude) in coping with welfare for the old
and the needy.  The Confucian duty of caring for one's parents was fine with
multi-generational families on their own plots in older times, and when 95%
of the population hardly stirred more than 5 miles from their places of
birth. 

It is rather reminiscent of Tudor England when the same phenomenon was
occurring -- when young adults started forsaking their parents in the
countryside and migrated into the new townships even if they couldn't find
work there. In those days, by a decree of 1536, their ears were cut off.
(More exactly, one ear was cut off. If they remained without a job or didn't
return to their parents, the other ear was cut off.  If they still
persisted, they were executed.) It was a short-lived policy, however, and
the butchery disappeared within a generation.

So, I suspect, will China's neoConfucian proposal.

Keith  



Keith Hudson, Saltford, England http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/
<http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/2010/12/> 2011/01/
<http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/2010/12/> 
  

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to