http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/euro/why/index_en.htm

 

An easy choice when the arrows are pointing up.  When there is retraction
and the pie is getting smaller there are anxious glances as to how the
others have kept their books.

 

arthur

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of D and N
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 1:42 PM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Euro encore

 

Wasn't one of the ideas of introducing a common currency to be rid of
"currency speculation" instead of just banning or outlawing it at the market
level?

Darryl


On 1/20/2011 10:29 AM, Ed Weick wrote: 

I would agree that where cultures are as different as those of Native
Americans and Europeans there is little hope of finding common cause.  One
wins; the other loses.  However, in the case of countries of the EU,
cultural differences are relatively minor.  What they did in the case of the
Euro is adopt a common currency but continue to maintain control over their
respective economies.  The result has been a rather messy mess, which is
something that often happens when idealism trumps practicality. 

 

Ed

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Ray Harrell <mailto:[email protected]>  

To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION'
<mailto:[email protected]>  

Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:16 AM

Subject: Re: [Futurework] Euro encore

 

One should remember that the U.S. and Canada have a very poor record with
this.   As long as the immigrant mix is uniform then the currency can follow
but when you have vastly different ethnic cultures in states then the
cooperation tends toward patronizing competition and creates disharmony.
Think Iraq as another example.   The Europeans couldn't have competing
societies and societal forms with us so they basically committed genocide to
disempower us rather than cooperate and build a common future.   Racism is
another version of same.    In my mind this proves the fallacy of "economics
as the core value" [i.e. wealth as the definition of value,]  of a society.
Money follows what truly is the core value of a society and that value is
culture and the web of relationships and assumptions culture creates [or
maybe religion] but it definitely isn't business or investments.    Business
is amoral and favors solutions that piss people off.     It took a thousand
years for China to arrive at their harmony and it is still tenuous with
their different languages and ethnic strains.    Such disharmony is the
reason that native peoples couldn't resist the invaders from Europe.    It's
also the reason that empires are always bound to fail as a system.
Admittedly this is simply my opinion.   Prove me wrong.  

 

REH

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Weick
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 7:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Futurework] Euro encore

 

And more Krugman.  The idealistic concept that a bunch of countries with
differing problems and different fiscal and administrative systems can
operate under a single currency is bound to unravel.

 

 

http://www.truth-out.org/the-eur-flailing-threatens-europe66926

  _____  

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

 
 
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to