MessageNot sure of what I'm being complacent about, Mike.  In the case of 
aboriginal people and their communities, I'd agree that things like information 
technology, air travel, education and access to lawyers and politicians have 
made huge differences.  Instead of just being pushed out of the way, they can 
now assert and defend their rights.  In the case of the EU and the Euro, I'm 
not so sure that Europe has genuinely changed from the Europe of history, a 
history that is rife with imposed utopian ideals that have often gone terribly 
wrong.  A good reference on this is John Gray's "Black Mass".  Gray is 
professor of European thought at the London School of Economics.

Ed

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Michael Gurstein 
  To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION' 
  Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 3:02 PM
  Subject: Re: [Futurework] Euro encore


  Ed, I think that is far too complacent a reply... 

  Negotiation and adaptation is possible when there is a degree of empowerment 
on both sides... One of the things that information technology has done IMHO is 
to offer the opportunity for that degree of empowerment to occur in a variety 
of places... It's not inevitable but it's possible... 
http://gurstein.wordpress.com/2010/01/31/e-bario-the-impact-of-a-telecentre-and-the-creation-of-a-technology-hub-in-the-highlands-of-borneo/
 and then do some searching around for eBario and also take a look at K-Net 
http://www.knet.ca and http://www.ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/issue/view/27

  The Euro and EU was a different case where the Southern laggards (at least 
their elites) thought that they could hitch a free ride into North European 
prosperity without adapting their local practices (knowing that to attempt to 
do so would be so wrenching as to render the task impossible... 

  Building from the ground up based on their own skills and resources was 
impossible of course, since the definition of economic success was imposed 
externally and then superimposed locally.

  We are all, of course, holding our breath to see what the outcome will be in 
Tunisia.

  M
    -----Original Message-----
    From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Weick
    Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 10:29 AM
    To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION
    Subject: Re: [Futurework] Euro encore


    I would agree that where cultures are as different as those of Native 
Americans and Europeans there is little hope of finding common cause.  One 
wins; the other loses.  However, in the case of countries of the EU, cultural 
differences are relatively minor.  What they did in the case of the Euro is 
adopt a common currency but continue to maintain control over their respective 
economies.  The result has been a rather messy mess, which is something that 
often happens when idealism trumps practicality. 

    Ed

      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Ray Harrell 
      To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION' 
      Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:16 AM
      Subject: Re: [Futurework] Euro encore


      One should remember that the U.S. and Canada have a very poor record with 
this.   As long as the immigrant mix is uniform then the currency can follow 
but when you have vastly different ethnic cultures in states then the 
cooperation tends toward patronizing competition and creates disharmony.    
Think Iraq as another example.   The Europeans couldn't have competing 
societies and societal forms with us so they basically committed genocide to 
disempower us rather than cooperate and build a common future.   Racism is 
another version of same.    In my mind this proves the fallacy of "economics as 
the core value" [i.e. wealth as the definition of value,]  of a society.    
Money follows what truly is the core value of a society and that value is 
culture and the web of relationships and assumptions culture creates [or maybe 
religion] but it definitely isn't business or investments.    Business is 
amoral and favors solutions that piss people off.     It took a thousand years 
for China to arrive at their harmony and it is still tenuous with their 
different languages and ethnic strains.    Such disharmony is the reason that 
native peoples couldn't resist the invaders from Europe.    It's also the 
reason that empires are always bound to fail as a system.   Admittedly this is 
simply my opinion.   Prove me wrong.  

       

      REH

       

      From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Weick
      Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 7:43 AM
      To: [email protected]
      Subject: [Futurework] Euro encore

       

      And more Krugman.  The idealistic concept that a bunch of countries with 
differing problems and different fiscal and administrative systems can operate 
under a single currency is bound to unravel.

       

       

      http://www.truth-out.org/the-eur-flailing-threatens-europe66926



--------------------------------------------------------------------------


      _______________________________________________
      Futurework mailing list
      [email protected]
      https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Futurework mailing list
  [email protected]
  https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to