Neo-liberalism (marketization) destroys the sense of common purpose.
 
Democratic societies depend on a sense of common purpose as their ultimate
guarantee.
 
The resolution of the economic crises (Iceland, Ireland, Greece, Portugal,
Spain... require broad sacrifice/common purporse and ultimately democratic
consent for their resolution (within the neo-liberal frame).
 
Something has to give... (we saw one approach in Iceland--resistance and
ultimate rejection of the frame; a second in Ireland--dreary resigned
acceptance and migration; the way forward in the others is still being
worked out... my bets are on Iceland rather than Ireland but an Iceland
solution in Spain or even Portugal (possibly even Greece) tears the fabric
apart certainly in Europe and likely globally.
 
The choice/contradiction that seems to be coming forward is between
democracy and neo-liberalism.
 
M  

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert Stennett
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 7:31 AM
To: EDUCATION RE-DESIGNING WORK INCOME DISTRIBUTION
Subject: [Futurework] Protest and it's purpose....






Should Wealth Be Held by the Few or Everyone? -- That's the Central Focus of
Protests from Spain to Greece

What started in Spain is now clearly spreading across Europe, where we have
witnessed social movements making similar demands for economic democracy. 
June 16, 2011  |   
 
 


 While “Europe’s slow-motion financial collapse” – as Mother Jones magazine
described it in a June 6 article – continues apace, Spain, like other
European states continues to implement anti-social/neo-liberal policies in
the face of strong opposition from the citizenry.

It has been one month since Spain’s “Indignados” (Indignant Ones) movement
non-violently claimed 60 city-squares across the country, calling for
economic democracy, political justice and peace.

Since then, much has happened within Spanish borders, and what is happening
there is clearly spreading across Europe, where we have witnessed social
movements making similar demands.

We have observed the rise of a parallel movement in Portugal where most city
squares have also been camped on by “Indignados” and where only hours before
the country’s general elections protesters in Lisbon were attacked and
beaten by police.

We have witnessed how on that same night, in Athens, Greece, 80,000
protesters congregated in the city’s main square in opposition to the
country’s “austerity measures,” waving banners in solidarity with the
“Indignados” of Spain and of other European countries.

In Paris, we have seen the Bastille taken non-violently by French
“Indignados” only to be quickly reclaimed by the country’s police force.

Wherever you look in Europe, you hear the same cries of indignation. In some
countries with more intensity than others, but the cry is becoming louder
everywhere, and what may seem like a slow-motion financial collapse is
rapidly becoming an accelerated social catastrophe.

Specifically in Spain, despite the political elite depicting a country
recovering from the financial collapse, everyday things are getting worse
economically, politically and socially.

Protests, although nonviolent for the most part, could be on the verge of
becoming violent unless the political and economic elites begin to make some
concessions.

On the economic front, Spain began the month of June with comments from the
European Commission about the potential that the country will miss its
economic growth and budget-deficit targets for the year. The commission’s
recommendation was more economic “reform.”

Then a report from the ratings agency Moody’s pointed out that the high
Catalan deficit was affecting the solvency of the whole of Spain.

A few days later, in the region of Castilla-La Mancha, the incoming
administration of the rightwing Popular Party (PP), before even taking
office, proclaimed that the region was “totally bankrupt.”

Then, the National Statistics Institute revealed that Spain’s property sales
in April had been the lowest since the institute began reporting in 2007.

Obviously, this stream of negative news, coupled with discussions taking
place in Europe regarding a potential debt default by Greece, affected
Spain’s bond sales and moved the country one step closer to a bailout, or a
default followed by its subsequent debt restructuring.

On the political front, June has been equally intense. The government has
approved by decree changes in collective bargaining agreements after failed
negotiations with the two major trade unions in the country.

The government also approved the extension indefinitely of the Spanish
military mission in Libya and announced the creation of a new NATO
operations center to control Spanish airspace and help missions coordinated
from Southern Europe.

On the social front, as of the first of June, the government warned that the
“Indignados” could not remain camped on city squares much longer.

Spain’s Prime Minister, Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, addressed the request
from the “Indignados” for electoral reform by telling them the changes could
only be possible through consensus from all political parties, a way to
respond without complying.

Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair visited Spain with the advice that
“demonstrators should be heard but not allowed to govern.”


Yet, according to a survey published by the newspaper El Pais, there exists
wide support (81 percent) for the movement among the Spanish population.

Among the supporters are public intellectuals, such as Vicent Navarro,
Arcadi Oliveras and Eduardo Galeano, along with political figures such as
Santiago Carrillo, who was the secretary general of the Spanish Communist
Party and a key voice during the country’s transition to democracy, and Cayo
Lara, the coordinator for the third largest political party in Spain,
Izquierda Unida.

Even Rosalía Mera, who is Spain’s richest woman according to Forbes
Magazine, has expressed public support for the “Indignados.”  

Reacting to recent events, commissions of the “Indignados” from across the
country met in Madrid’s Puerta del Sol Square to discuss the movement’s
future.

Through a process of popular assembly, they agreed to three key actions:

First, to boycott the country’s Town Halls as the new governments were sworn
in following the recent regional and local elections; second, to abandon
city squares and move their social action into city neighborhoods in an
attempt to broaden the movement’s involvement with the rest of the
citizenry; and third, to continue organizing protests on specific dates
focused on particular issues, including a firm commitment to a global
protest of “Indignados” on Oct. 15.

The first nationwide coordinated initiative since the spontaneous movement
mushroomed on May 15, the boycott of Town Halls, was well represented by
“Indignados” across Spain.

Demonstrators blocked entrances to Town Halls, climbed onto the balconies,
prevented official cars from exiting car parks, disturbed investiture
sessions with speeches, and followed politicians across cities as they
celebrated their victories, shouting to them, “shame on you!”

Artur Mas, president of the Generalitat (the government of the Catalan
autonomous region), was forced to arrive at parliament in a police
helicopter, as thousands of “Indignados” blocked the entrance in an attempt
to stop the region’s budget approval.

The protesters shouted: “You do not represent us!” The parliamentary session
began with only half of the representatives able to enter the building.

In Valencia, the police charged at demonstrators injuring 12 and arresting
five. To avoid further protests in that city, where the new government has
ten of its members including its president facing corruption charges,
Spain’s vice president, Alfredo Pérez Rubalcaba, canceled a planned trip.

In the city of Madrid, police batons struck protesters. In Salamanca, five
“Indignados” were injured. In Burgos, two were arrested. In Castellón, the
protesters were violently dispersed as they were in Vigo and in Santiago de
Compostela. 

Following the arrests across the country, spontaneous demonstrations
followed in front of police headquarters demanding the prompt release of
those detained. Most protesters were released on bail.

It seems clear, when one takes an in-depth look at events unfolding in
Spain, that these protests have hit a nerve throughout Spanish society,
despite the fact that the movement is practicing a form of nonviolent direct
democracy which is not familiar to most Spaniards, nor for that matter to
most citizens in Western-style democracies.

Spain’s political, social and economic climate is beginning to be shaped, at
least partially, by these cries of indignation.


Nevertheless, there is a danger that unless economic and political elites
begin to listen and engage in some serious dialogue with the “Indignados” –
instead of sending out the police to attack them – the nonviolence could
quickly turn to violence.

Spain’s nonviolent protesters are not Gandhi’s well-trained and disciplined
nonviolent peacemakers with months of rigorous training in Gandhian Ashrams.
This is a one-month-old spontaneous and diverse movement, which is only now
beginning to organize and present specific demands.

Whether the “Indignados” will turn violent if the police continue to beat
them – or whether the country’s elites will begin addressing the popular
demands rising from the streets – we will learn only as events unfold.

Pablo Ouziel's articles and essays are available at pabloouziel.com.





_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to