I should start reading from the top.   I come in after teaching a class
until nine and find that Ed commented on bedbugs first.   Either he's an
artist or I'm an economist. 

 

REH

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Weick
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 3:18 PM
To: [email protected]; RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Professional Ethics (of economists)

 

Rat farming?  How about bedbugs?  They're making a comeback.

 

Ed

 

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: "Mike Spencer" < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]>

To: < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]>

Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 2:30 PM

Subject: [Futurework] Re: Professional Ethics (of economists)

 

> 
> Last night, I commented on Tom's reference:
> 
>>>
<http://ecologicalheadstand.blogspot.com/2011/09/professional-ethics.html>
http://ecologicalheadstand.blogspot.com/2011/09/professional-ethics.html
>>
>>   Over the past 30 years, the economics discipline has been
>>   systematically subverted....Many of the most prominent economists
>>   in America are now paid to testify in Congress, to serve on boards
>>   of directors, testify in antitrust cases and regulatory
>>   proceedings, and to give speeches to the companies and industries
>>   they study and write about with supposed objectivity. This is not
>>   a marginal activity; it is now an industry, run by a half dozen
>>   large companies.
>>
>> I didn't know that.  Why does that remind me somehow of the privatized
>> prison industry? 
> 
> Saw this on Slash/dot:
> 
>    How Bug Bounties Are Like Rat Farming 104 
> 
>    Posted by timothy on Tuesday September 20, @11:00AM 
>    from the first-we-hypothesize-a-problem dept. 
> 
>    Gunkerty Jeb writes "In a keynote speech at the United Security
>    Summit, Stephen Dubner, co-author of Freakonomics, drew parallels
>    between the increasingly popular (and successful) practice of
>    software vendors offering bug bounties and a new industry
>    springing up in Johannesburg, South Africa, where the population
>    has recently found itself beset with a growing rat problem. In
>    order to help mitigate their rodent problem, officials in
>    Johannesburg began offering a small monetary rewards for each dead
>    rat turned in. It was wildly successful, and it didn't take long
>    for fresh batch of entrepreneurs to pop up and exploit the
>    situation. Of course, I'm talking about rat farming. Evidently,
>    business minded individuals have taken to breeding rats, only to
>    kill them and turn them in for rewards.  Obviously, rat farming is
>    somewhat unscrupulous, but security researchers are doing the same
>    thing: breeding bugs in the lab, then leading them to the
>    slaughter for a nice payday.  And it's a good thing."
> 
> Which probably isn't a totally new thing [1] but a reminder about how
> that works with prisons, weapon systems and (allegedly) economists.
> 
> The way it works out for (software-) bug hunting -- the relevance for
> Slash-dotters -- seems to be free of the malignancy/fraudulence of rat
> farming:
> 
>
<http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/how-bug-bounties-are-rat-farming-092011>
http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/how-bug-bounties-are-rat-farming-092011
> 
> as one commenter there (somewhat intemperately) observes.
> 
> So the question is: how do you structure privatization of prisons,
> corporatized for-fee economics consulting or any such activity so that
> it works like bug-hunting and not like rat-farming?  Do we need to
> somehow extract or sequester such activities completely from
> capitalist incentives?
> 
> 
> - Mike
> 
> 
> [1] The Paris rat-catcher of circa 1689 in Stephenson's _Quicksilver_
>    was already (and quite entertainingly) into rat farming.
> 
> -- 
> Michael Spencer                  Nova Scotia, Canada       .~. 
>                                                           /V\ 
>  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
/( )\
>  <http://home.tallships.ca/mspencer/> http://home.tallships.ca/mspencer/
^^-^^
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
>  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
>  <https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework>
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to