Alright Tom,   NYCity is obsessed with bedbugs as is Connecticut.   The
question is whether they are being salted or not by the local
entrepreneurs..   As for moral sciences?     I understood that
Utilitarianism came out of the search of the ultimate pleasure which
ownership and money was supposed to give one.   i.e. maximum utility.
C.S. Pierce said that morality and the foundation of human logic was to be
found in the patterning skills of Aesthetics.    I would add that  the
virtuosic skills of performance first appears in the concept of what it
means to be an "artist" in any profession.   Even economics.    I believe
that economics is the domain that appears after the connection to the mother
creates the domain of spirituality and the development of the perceptions
creates the domain of aesthetics and the arts.   That sets the stage for
some little bugger to start negotiating with their mother from the skills
they've learned in order to create the first contract and the concept of a
bargain.    Hence the third domain in the life of the child, the domain of
what will become known as business, trade or economics.    I suspect that
happens over and over again in the life of every individual on the planet no
matter where the mother happens to live.    One thing is sure;  that third
domain is amoral and the struggle is on for the soul of the child.
Whether normal, a sociopath or a plain old psychopath in their handling of
negotiations and the way of the market.    That need creates the fourth
domain of Education where the child is traditionally weaned away from pure
short term selfishness and pointed in the direction of cooperation. 

 

REH

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sandwichman
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 10:05 PM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Professional Ethics (of economists)

 

Either that or you're both obsessed with bedbugs... But, hey, to bring this
discussion back to where it started, I just want to mention that "economics"
sprung from "moral sciences": "The emergence of economics as a separate
subject (or Tripos, in Cambridge terminology) created intense debate over
its relationship with the existing organization of teaching through the
'Moral Sciences' Tripos. John Neville Keynes, the father of John Maynard
Keynes, faced considerable mental and emotional anxiety in his attempt to
reconcile economic science with ethics and religion." (Martin Daunton,
"Welfare, Taxation and Social Justice")



On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Ray Harrell <[email protected]> wrote:

I should start reading from the top.   I come in after teaching a class
until nine and find that Ed commented on bedbugs first.   Either he's an
artist or I'm an economist. 

 

REH

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Weick
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 3:18 PM


To: [email protected]; RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION

Subject: Re: [Futurework] Professional Ethics (of economists)

 

Rat farming?  How about bedbugs?  They're making a comeback.

 

Ed

 

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: "Mike Spencer" < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]>

To: < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]>

Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 2:30 PM

Subject: [Futurework] Re: Professional Ethics (of economists)

 

> 
> Last night, I commented on Tom's reference:
> 
>>>
<http://ecologicalheadstand.blogspot.com/2011/09/professional-ethics.html>
http://ecologicalheadstand.blogspot.com/2011/09/professional-ethics.html
>>
>>   Over the past 30 years, the economics discipline has been
>>   systematically subverted....Many of the most prominent economists
>>   in America are now paid to testify in Congress, to serve on boards
>>   of directors, testify in antitrust cases and regulatory
>>   proceedings, and to give speeches to the companies and industries
>>   they study and write about with supposed objectivity. This is not
>>   a marginal activity; it is now an industry, run by a half dozen
>>   large companies.
>>
>> I didn't know that.  Why does that remind me somehow of the privatized
>> prison industry? 
> 
> Saw this on Slash/dot:
> 
>    How Bug Bounties Are Like Rat Farming 104 
> 
>    Posted by timothy on Tuesday September 20, @11:00AM 
>    from the first-we-hypothesize-a-problem dept. 
> 
>    Gunkerty Jeb writes "In a keynote speech at the United Security
>    Summit, Stephen Dubner, co-author of Freakonomics, drew parallels
>    between the increasingly popular (and successful) practice of
>    software vendors offering bug bounties and a new industry
>    springing up in Johannesburg, South Africa, where the population
>    has recently found itself beset with a growing rat problem. In
>    order to help mitigate their rodent problem, officials in
>    Johannesburg began offering a small monetary rewards for each dead
>    rat turned in. It was wildly successful, and it didn't take long
>    for fresh batch of entrepreneurs to pop up and exploit the
>    situation. Of course, I'm talking about rat farming. Evidently,
>    business minded individuals have taken to breeding rats, only to
>    kill them and turn them in for rewards.  Obviously, rat farming is
>    somewhat unscrupulous, but security researchers are doing the same
>    thing: breeding bugs in the lab, then leading them to the
>    slaughter for a nice payday.  And it's a good thing."
> 
> Which probably isn't a totally new thing [1] but a reminder about how
> that works with prisons, weapon systems and (allegedly) economists.
> 
> The way it works out for (software-) bug hunting -- the relevance for
> Slash-dotters -- seems to be free of the malignancy/fraudulence of rat
> farming:
> 
>
<http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/how-bug-bounties-are-rat-farming-092011>
http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/how-bug-bounties-are-rat-farming-092011
> 
> as one commenter there (somewhat intemperately) observes.
> 
> So the question is: how do you structure privatization of prisons,
> corporatized for-fee economics consulting or any such activity so that
> it works like bug-hunting and not like rat-farming?  Do we need to
> somehow extract or sequester such activities completely from
> capitalist incentives?
> 
> 
> - Mike
> 
> 
> [1] The Paris rat-catcher of circa 1689 in Stephenson's _Quicksilver_
>    was already (and quite entertainingly) into rat farming.
> 
> -- 
> Michael Spencer                  Nova Scotia, Canada       .~. 
>                                                           /V\ 
>  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
/( )\
>  <http://home.tallships.ca/mspencer/> http://home.tallships.ca/mspencer/
^^-^^
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
>  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
>  <https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework>
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework




-- 
Sandwichman

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to