But like the Bloomsbury group said things that were sometimes interesting, 
though provocative.

 

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Keith Hudson
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 1:05 AM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION; michael gurstein
Subject: Re: [Futurework] FW: Freedom Rider: Christopher Hitchens, White Man | 
Black Agenda Report

 

Margaret Kimberley is about right in her description of Christopher Hitchens. 
Along with Martin Amis.Jeremy Paxman and a few more cronies he was part of a 
solipsist neo-Bloomsbury Group which, if anything, was even more pretentious 
than the original one. As with Woolf, Forster and Keynes a generation or so 
ago, he and a few more looked down their intellectual noses at those they 
conceived to be of lesser merit and intimidated those who didn't exactly agree 
with their own view (as it happened to be at any particular point in time). 

K  

At 19:55 21/12/2011, you wrote:



More contrarian perspectives on Hitchens... M -----Original Message----- From: 
[email protected] [ mailto:[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> ] On Behalf Of Sid Shniad Sent: Wednesday, 
December 21, 2011 11:29 AM Subject: Freedom Rider: Christopher Hitchens, White 
Man | Black Agenda Report 
http://www.blackagendareport.com/content/freedom-rider-christopher-hitchens-white-man
 [image: Black Agenda Report] ------------------------------ *12/21/2011* 
Freedom Rider: Christopher Hitchens, White Man *by BAR editor and senior 
columnist Margaret Kimberley* There was nothing witty, cute, or endearing about 
the late Christopher Hitchens, a racist to the core whose association with the 
Left served only to discredit it. “Beneath his mutteringngs against 
‘Islamofascism’ he was nothing morng more than an angry white guy who 
wanted brown people to be conquered or dead.â€Â A man of many prejudices but 
no  real loyalties or principles, he flowed with the money. “Why toil away 
as a left winger known only within ththat smaller group, when more money and 
media attention awaited a cheer leader for pax Americana and white 
supremacy?â€Â “*In the end all his words amounted to  to nothing more than 
fighting for the rights of white people to control everyone else in the 
world.â€Â* The Brittish born writer Christopher Hitchens died of cancer last 
week. The outpouring of grief and praise for a man who can only be called a 
propagandist for barbaric ideologies may seem curious at first glance, but 
there is an ugly and logical explanation for the reaction. Mr. Hitchens was for 
many years known as a leftist, a self-described Trotskyite. He wrote a column 
in *The Nation* magazine during that time, and was known for excoriating the 
likes of Henry Kissinger for the carnage he carried out in Vietnam and 
Southeast Asia that killed millions of people.. In more recent years Hitchens 
took a sharp turn in his writings and public statements and in the process 
became far more famous, and no doubt a lot richer. After the September 11, 2001 
attacks on New York and Washington, Hitchens came out of the closet and 
presented himself to the world as a full blown neo-con, an unconditional 
supporter of the Bush administration̢۪s aggressions. So great was hishis love 
for the Bushites that he took the citizenship oath in a naturalization ceremony 
presided over by Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff. Hitchens became a 
favorite of pundits, and with a body of prolific work and glib statements in 
the media, he was rarely out of the spotlight. Yet in the end all his words 
amounted to nothing more than fighting for the rights of white people to 
control everyone else in the world.* * “*Hitchens came out t of the closet 
and presented himself to the world as a full blown neo-con, an unconditional 
supporter of the Bush administration’s aggressions.â€Â* 
Hitchensââ‚s’ descent into support for western imperialism was, ass 
George Galloway put it, a metamorphosis “from butttterfly back into 
slug,â€Â but it wasn’t as sudd sudden as it seemed. Like most criminals, 
Hitchens showed his true side earlier on. In 1992 he was invited to attend a 
protest opposing the quincentenary celebration of Columbus̢۪ arrival in the 
western hemisphere. Hitchens ma made it clear that he was not at all put off by 
the genocide of Indians and enslavement of Africans. As *he put it< 
http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/3737110.html 
<http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/3737110.html> > [3]*, "1492 was a very good 
year and deserves to be celebrated with great vim and gusto." According to him, 
the coming of the European and the barbarity which ensued is just the way 
things happen, and in fact all for the betterment of humankind. “But those 
who view the history of North Amemerica as a narrative of genocide and slavery 
are, it seems to me, hopelessly stuck on this reactionary position. They can 
think of the Western expansion of the United States only in terms of plague 
blankets, bootleg booze and dead buffalo, never in terms of the medicine chest, 
the wheel and the railway . . . But it does happen to be the way that history 
is made, and to complain about it is as empty as complaint about climatic, 
geological or tectonic shift.â€Â In other words, it is part of the natural 
ordder of the universe for the world and its people to be under the rule of 
whites, with people of color preferably under their control whenever possible. 
The political ascension of George W. Bush and the beginning of the war on 
terror was all the opening that Hitchens, a leftist poseur, needed. Why toil 
away as a left winger known only within that smaller group, when more money and 
media attention awaited a cheer leader for pax Americana and white supremacy? 
“*Once again we see that the endless aggressision is not really opposed by 
most Americans, and they prove it by lionizing the likes of the late 
Hitchens.â€Â** His fans may argue with the assessment, calling his 
unqualified support of the Iraq occupation a “mistake,e,â€Â when it was no 
such thing. Hitchens decided to maake a living, a very good one, as a 
professional white man. Beneath his mutterings against 
“Islamofascismââ‚€ he was nothing more than an angry white guy who 
wanted brown people to be conquered or dead. The liberals who swooned over his 
British accent and his media savvy may not want to admit it, but they also 
admired his openly imperialist and indeed racist point of view. He claimed to 
be sickened by Saddam Hussein̢۪s tyranny, but what at he really wanted was 
for the Arabs to be subservient, in no position to question or to oppose the 
powerful white-run nations of the west. As for tyranny, if people who looked 
like him were carrying it out, it wasn̢۪t so ba bad after all. The bizarre 
levels of admiration on display for this man are symptomatic of a much larger 
problem. Once again we see that the endless aggression is not really opposed by 
most Americans, and they prove it by lionizing the likes of the late Hitchens. 
They too think that powerful white people have the right to lay waste to entire 
regions of the world and to the human beings within them. In fact, they 
don̢۪t think that non-white people le are really human beings with the rights 
they assume for themselves. Hitchens may have been in the minority in publicly 
proclaiming the rightness of mass murder but that doesn̢۪t mean he was alone. 
Now that he has passed ad away, it is clear that his ideas were loved by many 
people, who also hearken back to a time when white was openly declared right, 
and with ample doses of “vim and gusustoâ€Â too. *Margaret Kimberley's 
Freedom Rider colummn appears weekly in BAR, and is widely reprinted elsewhere. 
She maintains a frequently updated blog as well as at ** 
http://freedomrider.blogspot.com <http://freedomrider.blogspot.com/>  .< 
http://freedomrider.blogspot.com/ <http://freedomrider.blogspot.com/> > [4]* 
*Ms. Kimberley lives in New York City, and can be reached via e-Mail at 
Margaret.Kimberley(at)BlackAgandaReport.com*.    - Christopher Hitchens racist< 
http://blackagendareport.com/category/media-media-justice-and-media-reform/christopher-hitchens-racist
 
<http://blackagendareport.com/category/media-media-justice-and-media-reform/christopher-hitchens-racist>
  > ------------------------------ *Source URL:* 
http://blackagendareport.com/content/freedom-rider-christopher-hitchens-white-man
 *Links:* [1] 
http://blackagendareport.com/category/media-media-justice-and-media-reform/christopher-hitchens-racist
 [2] 
http://blackagendareport.com/sites/www.blackagendareport.com/files/christopher_hitchens.jpg
 [3] http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/3737110.html [4] 
http://freedomrider.blogspot.com/ [5] 
http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fblackagendareport.com%2Fcontent%2Ffreedom-rider-christopher-hitchens-white-man
 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fblackagendareport.com%2Fcontent%2Ffreedom-rider-christopher-hitchens-white-man&amp;linkname=Freedom%20Rider%3A%20Christopher%20Hitchens%2C%20White%20Man>
 &amp;linkname=Freedom%20Rider%3A%20Christopher%20Hitchens%2C%20White%20Man < 
http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fblackagendareport.com%2Fcontent%2Ffreedom-rider-christopher-hitchens-white-man
 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fblackagendareport.com%2Fcontent%2Ffreedom-rider-christopher-hitchens-white-man&linkname=Freedom%20Rider%3A%20Christopher%20Hitchens%2C%20White%20Man>
 &linkname=Freedom%20Rider%3A%20Christopher%20Hitchens%2C%20White%20Man > 
_______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list 
[email protected] 
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework 

Keith Hudson, Saltford, England http://allisstatus.wordpress.com 
<http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/> 
  

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to