That's odd. I had thought I first learned about them here...

 -Pete

On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Arthur Cordell wrote:

> First I have heard of the Yes Men.  Interesting.  
> 
> I don't go along with the black bloc nor do I go along with the conventional
> thinking of the power structure.  
> 
> And with certainty I can say that no one but no one knows how these
> competing forces will play out.  
> 
> Arthur
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of pete
> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 5:06 PM
> To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
> Subject: Re: [Futurework] What Does Our Reaction To Black Bloc Tactics Say
> About Us? | NEWS JUNKIE POST
> 
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, D & N wrote:
> 
> > OK Pete.
> > 
> > So, Back to the 'rule of law'.
> 
> No, back to constructive rather than confrontational behaviour. 
> Compare positive to negative press for the "black bloc" vs Occupy.
> I've always suspected the back bloc is heavily salted with agents 
> provocateur for the specific purpose of engendering negative 
> press to taint the message of any movement in which they are active.
> 
> > 
> > How would you propose to educate or otherwise enlighten these 
> > 'oppressed' to better tactics. Voting? Vote for which of the 1% sitting 
> > on any of the parties in the running? 
> 
> That's inane. I was concise in my prescription. There's plenty of 
> material online about the Yes Men. 
> 
> -Pete
> 
> 
> > How does one rally those who have 
> > been dumped upon (ie ghettoized) or otherwise finding themselves in such 
> > predicaments that they cannot see a way to get out and the frustration 
> > builds to the point of anger because there may be lots of people 
> > listening but very few are being helpful - just critical.
> > 
> > Would you place suicide bombers in the same category?
> > 
> > Granted lashing out at the neighbourhood is certainly self-defeating but 
> > what other avenues are open to them? They cannot get close enough to 
> > those who have caused the problem to attack them. And that appears to be 
> > the key. If you can't poke the problem in the eye, how can you remove 
> > the thorn?
> > 
> > D.
> > 
> > 
> > On 16/02/2012 1:05 PM, pete wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 [email protected] wrote:
> > >
> > >> Parts of this post echoes sentiments and ideas expressed by others on
> > >> the list.
> > >>
> > >> Barry
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> http://newsjunkiepost.com/2012/02/15/what-does-our-reaction-to-black-bloc-ta
> ctics-say-about-us/
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> By Liam Fox
> > >> NEWS JUNKIE POST
> > >>
> > >> Feb 15, 2012 at 7:02 am
> > >> What Does Our Reaction To Black Bloc Tactics Say About Us?
> > >>
> > >   [...]
> > >> If there is a criticism of Black Bloc tactics, perhaps it should be
> > >> that they have been insufficient to stop the ongoing corporate and
> > >> state violence.  What good is breaking a window, or spray-painting a
> > >> wall, or rolling a dumpster into the street and setting it on fire, if
> > >> nothing comes of it but negative press?
> > > A lame defense of unacceptable behaviour, which only here touches
> > > on the most important reason that these knuckle draggers need to be
> > > censured. Negative press is not a minor criticism, it is central
> > > to the indictment of the folly of this behaviour.
> > >
> > >> All the good intentions, the
> > >> important message, and the righteous cause, are useless without a
> > >> medium to communicate them to the masses.  Independent and social
> > >> media have grown but they are nothing compared to corporate media.
> > >> What reach the new media does have, and the growth it has experienced,
> > >> is being actively challenged by legislation designed to allow the
> > >> state to censor, control, and even eliminate it.  Symbolic action
> > >> alone is not getting the job done, and it faces even more barriers to
> > >> its efficacy in the future.
> > >>
> > > [...]
> > >> We need to stop offering harsh judgment of Black Bloc tactics.  It
> > >> does not speak well of our values. Those tactics, given the needed
> > >> amount of support, can move beyond attempts to get our attention and
> > >> potentially bring an end to the violence being  perpetrated against
> > >> humanity by the wealthy, the corporations they own, and the States
> > >> they control.  In order to do this we need to join the struggle, not
> > >> allow our cowardice to condemn it. There is right and there is wrong,
> > >> and fighting to stop something that you know is wrong, is right.
> > > Rubbish. If only one in a hundred of the self-absorbed short sighted
> > > bozos involved in "black bloc" behaviours were to have the courage
> > > and imagination to channel their outrage into tactics along the lines
> > > of the Yes Men, and the other 99 just stay home, the net result would
> > > be vastly more effective.
> > >
> > >   -Pete
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Futurework mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Futurework mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
> > 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to