This came out a week ago: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/fed-americans-wealth-dropped-40-percent/2012/06/11/gJQAlIsCVV_story.html

With figures such as these, over which some of the top feared disastrous psychological pressures are placed on the individual, and other Western nations experiencing similar hardships over employment, everyone is exactly where the 1% need them to be for a repeat of the Dirty 30's. Bear in mind, the wealthier nations have never really been well off--they were acting as if scarce resources are unlimited, and very much failing to realize that if their fellow humans abroad are suffering, primarily due to said selfishness, or because of destructive 3rd world development strategies that better achieve that end. What adversely affects one group eventually comes back to bite the rest, like pollution and war.

We already have, according to CBC this morning, some 25 wars globally, most of which have been long-term. As Ed suggests below, countless turf wars should develop within municipalities over everything from luxuries to basics as things get tougher. But gangs, as well as the top 1%, will run out of staple supplies.

We may soon have to do what Cuba did when the USSR stopped sending food and fertilizer after its collapse. Because Cuba's economy was based solely on growing and exporting sugar cane and tobacco, both heavily dependant on chemicals for mono-culture crops, everyone had no choice but to go organic, and grow their own. It swiftly became the only way to feed themselves in a world unwilling to provide assistance. And it was the best thing that could have happened to them. Lets hope they can stay clear of derivatives, fiat funds and US food wars. And for year-round energy to grow our own food, we'll be forced to develop alternative energy--another life saving industry. That is, if we can stay together as a society.

With an unrelenting, still feverish "1984"-like belief in derivatives/swaps being good for the economy, despite the big meltdown and all consequences, and with no government rules or checks foreseeable and all politicians investing heavily in such unhealthy markets themselves, I suspect the money masters will be free to run both treasury and resources past the point of rebuilding for a very long time. Down the road, derivatives won't work as B.S. once the system collapses. Gold will likely return as the standard, if weapons don't. Rebuilding will likely become a local thing for those areas where we don't kill one another off, though how we can avoid guns and aggression as part of that new world, I'm not sure. Short of gene manipulation to rid us of stupidity and suit-psycho behaviour, we'd best prepare for more craziness. The notion of neural manipulation, though already in the works in the secretive worlds of the controllers, is too costly and time consuming with society soon to crash round our ankles. Just another control dream. Though many would guess correctly that advertising, education and propaganda have worked beautifully in this respect, their effects require constant tweaking and chronic exposure. There won't be such expenditures in the near future.

This could be viewed as typical of gloom, but my response is atypical of the Canadian masses. Where they place faith in oil, Harper or other politicians, or even religion to pull us up out of economic despair, I believe that life's purpose is noble, far richer and definitely more capably envisioned than any Wall Street puppet master can conceive. Controllers can't control life's meaning, though they manipulate many minds to that effect for what seems an eternity. Many civilizations collapsed because of usurpers and undeserving leaders. In time, a drop in the bucket. Built upon falsehoods, nothing lasts. Millions may die needlessly, but this sick fairy tale with the greedy and powerful as worshipful cries out for a fresh ending, and that ending calls for rejection of money as god; for enlightened humans to become Earth's caretakers and one another's compassionate and respectful teachers. We have to rewrite, re-envision, re-distribute, re-tell, re-learn and re-think, re-educate, and re-wire towards a responsible, and life-teeming future. But I don't believe those great voices will be heard until the monstrous machine grinds to a halt. Once media is down, and armies and civil servants are no longer paid to protect politicians, the mercenary forces will be far off in isolation, guarding the elusive banksters. Then communication will be possible. The dirty diapers will at last get changed. In short, no faith in the system, but plenty in the purpose of mind and existence.

*Natalia*

<http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/fed-americans-wealth-dropped-40-percent/2012/06/11/gJQAlIsCVV_story.html>
On 19/06/2012 12:07 PM, Ed Weick wrote:
Whatever is happening is a mix of things. Gloom does seem to have taken over -- a general feeling that even when you really try, you're not going to get anywhere, so why bother. Things afflicting the US economy, and parts of Canada as well, include the growing power of the 1%, the loss of jobs because of automation, the sending of jobs abroad where they can be done more cheaply, the purchase of products we used to make from foreign sources, and a general uncertainty about where things are going. The proportion of the labour force that has stopped looking for work has grown, as has unemployment among those who still want to work. And college degrees don't seem to matter much anymore. The old system of middle class propriety and sobriety is fading out, as is the middle class itself. However, something else that isn't given much attention as yet may be happening. In his "Coming Apart", Charles Murray refers to groups called something like "street corner gangs" that are increasingly present in /Fishtown/, where his poor whites of America live. These guys don't want steady jobs or responsibilities, but they will take advantage of whatever may come their way -- welfare, petty crime, or whatever -- and they are learning to stay afloat quite effectively in the increasingly depressed economy. Yet one has to wonder what would happen if their numbers grew. Might they move society away from it's present state of manageable disorder and more deeply toward chaos?
Ed

    ----- Original Message -----
    *From:* de Bivort Lawrence <mailto:[email protected]>
    *To:* RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Sent:* Tuesday, June 19, 2012 12:12 PM
    *Subject:* Re: [Futurework] Gloomy America

    Gloom is popular these days....

    Not that there is not good reason for concern, more for some than
    others. It is when gloom and pessimism become a psychological
    condition and displace the natural abilities of a person or
    community to be proactive in resolving the reasons for concern
    that gloom-as-fad becomes dangerous, and perhaps fatal to the
    person or community.

    I see such self-defeating levels of gloom in some people and some
    communities in the US and Europe, and, to refer to some of the
    messages posted here, to Canada as well.

    To an interesting extent, the nature of this gloom is ironic:
    wealthy societies and their members falling into gloom because
    their levels of wealth have fallen, while in poorer parts of the
    world optimism reigns as people experience and expect relative
    progress, though the level of progress they may achieve will still
    be far below that thought of as the norm in the wealthy societies.

    Is there some karmic justice in this? Have the wealthy merely
    become spoiled, and in their ensuing gloom they guarantee their
    further fall toward the global median?

    I've always credited Canada with better political discourse,
    cleaner and less-selfish motives than the US, and better (foreign)
    policies. It saddens me to see Canada seemingly sink into the
    political and psychological norms of the US. I so much hope that I
    am overstating the case.

    Cheers,
    Lawry

    *From:*[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Ed
    Weick
    *Sent:* Tuesday, June 19, 2012 7:45 AM
    *To:* 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION';
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* [Futurework] Gloomy America

    Worth reading, but brace yourselves, it's gloomy.

    Ed

    
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/19/us/many-american-workers-are-underemployed-and-underpaid.html?_r=1&hp
    
<http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/19/us/many-american-workers-are-underemployed-and-underpaid.html?_r=1&hp>

    Sample:

    Now, with the economy shaping up as the central issue of the
    presidential election, both President Obama and Mitt Romney have
    been relentlessly trying to make the case that their policies
    would bring prosperity back. The unease of voters is striking: in
    a New York Times/CBS News poll
    
<http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/04/19/us/politics/20120419_poll_docs.html?ref=politics>in
    April, half of the respondents said they thought the next
    generation of Americans would be worse off, while only about a
    quarter said it would have a better future.

    And household wealth is dropping. The Federal Reserve reported
    
<http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/12/business/economy/family-net-worth-drops-to-level-of-early-90s-fed-says.html?ref=binyaminappelbaum>last
    week that the economic crisis left the median American family in
    2010 with no more wealth than in the early 1990s, wiping away two
    decades of gains. With stocks too risky for many small investors
    and savings accounts paying little interest, building up a nest
    egg is a challenge even for those who can afford to sock away
    some of their money.

    Expenses like putting a child through college --- where tuition
    has been rising faster
    <http://trends.collegeboard.org/college_pricing>than inflation or
    wages --- can be a daunting task. When Morgan Woodward, 21, began
    her freshman year at the University of California, Berkeley,
    three years ago, her parents paid about $9,000 a year in tuition
    and fees. Now they pay
    <http://students.berkeley.edu/finaid/news/detail25.htm>closer to
    $13,000, and they are bracing for the possibility of another jump
    next year. With their incomes flat, though, they recently
    borrowed money to pay for her final year, and to begin paying the
    tuition of their son, who plans to start college this fall.

    _______________________________________________
    Futurework mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    _______________________________________________
    Futurework mailing list
    [email protected]
    https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework



_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to