Which one is the girl? REH
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of de Bivort Lawrence Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2012 11:41 AM To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION Subject: Re: [Futurework] Process this one folks... Greetings, The description of the study made it seem, at best, only to offer much smaller and even then tenuous conclusions than the researcher state and the study supports. But I find the initial thought interesting: looking at things "globally", vs "locally". I think it merits further examination, including political topics. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict comes immediately to mind, and the global/local distinction may be of true and significant use here. Cheers, Lawry On Jul 28, 2012, at 11:19 AM, D & N wrote: > Interesting. So, by this light; is this an age-old, deeply ingrained concept? One that has followed us from the cave all through our history? And therefore something that should be known but not worth understanding? It is hard wired - not learned??? > > D. > > On 27/07/2012 7:00 PM, Ray Harrell wrote: >> I walked into my studio and spoke to two professional women successful in >> their field and reported the results. Their comments were "So?" "why are >> you surprised? Of course that's true." "We think of you as a hunk and >> you think of us as body parts." >> >> Oh well. >> >> REH >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of D & N >> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 9:52 PM >> To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION >> Subject: Re: [Futurework] Process this one folks... >> >> Pete, even though I do not like the findings either, I think you may >> be projecting. I do not know what sector of society the "responders" >> were from but from what is constantly displayed on TV and in the >> movies (and in bars) suggests that the responses are likely correct >> for our male dominated and misogynist oriented society. Just another >> example from the new Sodom and Gomorrah. >> >> But sex is sex and status is status; sex comes in small parts and >> status is >> big.<)) >> >> Darryl >> >> >> On 27/07/2012 2:55 PM, pete wrote: >>> Obvously the responders were just displaying their contempt for the >>> condescending and insulting test. i would probably be strongly >>> tempted to do the same thing. >>> >>> -PV >>> >>> On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, michael gurstein wrote: >>> >>>> http://ca.news.yahoo.com/men-seen-whole-women-body-parts-181312461. >>>> ht >>>> ml >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Futurework mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Futurework mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Futurework mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Futurework mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework >> > > _______________________________________________ > Futurework mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
