That's not education, that's coaching. 

REH

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Harry Pollard
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 11:07 PM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Cc: Keith Hudson
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Brilliant analysis of future jobs and trends

But, what if the education enslaves?

Harry
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Ray Harrell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Next thing we will see will be studies on the genuine value of governments
> versus wild west corporations.    "Governments don't help all that much,
may
> as well not have them and trust your gun."    The neo-Corporatist right
wing
> has been pushing such studies for at least ten years here.    Personally,
I
> believe education and competence is the only basis of freedom.   Only
> education can conquer the insecurity that is the root of the mental
slavery
> we are encountering at the moment.    There is a lot of writing about this
> by the American Founders and especially Thomas Jefferson.
>
>
>
> REH
>
>
>
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Keith 
> Hudson
> Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 1:13 AM
> To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, , EDUCATION
> Subject: [Futurework] Brilliant analysis of future jobs and trends
>
>
>
> Quite the most brilliant analysis of education and job trends in 
> America I have yet read appears as an op-ed on Bloomberg website. I've 
> copied it here in case it is soon replaced.
>
> Keith
>
> How Recession Will Change University Financing
>
> A. Gary Shilling
>
> The latest recession will probably be seen as a turning point for 
> college and university financing.
>
> Indeed, the initial reaction by many youths to soaring unemployment 
> was to stay in or return to college to wait out the bad times and get 
> better prepared to face a tough job market. For-profit and community 
> colleges have been especially attractive, and in the fall of 2011, 
> there were 22 percent more students enrolled in the nation's 1,200 
> community colleges than in the fall of 2007. Nevertheless, less than half
graduate.
>
> Also, those now leaving college are finding few jobs. Only 54 percent 
> of those age 18 to 24 are employed, the lowest share since data began 
> to be collected in 1948, and the unemployment- rate gap between this 
> demographic group and all working-age adults is the widest on record. 
> Only 49 percent of graduates from the classes of 2009 to 2011 found 
> jobs within their first year out of school, compared with 73 percent 
> of those who graduated three years earlier. About 54 percent of 
> bachelor's- degree holders under 25, or about 1.5 million people, were
jobless or underemployed last year.
>
> In addition, there is now research challenging the economic value of a 
> college education. Data comparing the average earnings of college 
> graduates at each age with those of workers with only a high-school 
> diploma indicate that the first group has an advantage of $1 million 
> or more for full-time work from age 25 to 64. But college-bound 
> students usually have better abilities, better grades, more maturity, 
> better support from home, higher test scores and better job prospects 
> than those who enter the workforce out of high school.
>
> Lifetime Income
>
> Furthermore, the raw lifetime-income differences don't account for 
> tuition costs, interest on student loans, lost wages while in college, 
> and the discounting of future earnings.
>
> Various studies that take these things into account indicate that each 
> year of college adds 6 percent to 10 percent to annual incomes, so 
> lifetime earnings increase by a range of $300,000 to $600,000, not $1 
> million or more. The College Board calculates that using 2008 data, a 
> student entering college in 2010 at age 18 who borrows his way to a 
> degree earns enough by age 33 to make up the cost, including wages forgone
and loan interest.
> That's a 5 percent to 6 percent return on investment - -- meaningful 
> but not huge. These results partly reflect the 184 percent increase in 
> real tuition costs in the past 20 years, which has occurred as the 
> real pay of college graduates has risen only 9 percent.
>
> The cost of college certainly makes raising children more expensive. 
> The Agriculture Department reports that a family with $59,410 to 
> $102,870 in pretax income will spend almost $300,000 to raise a child 
> for the first 17 years. But that doesn't take into account the unpaid 
> time spent on parenting, including income forgone by parents who stay 
> at home or work less in order to care for their offspring. It also 
> doesn't consider the opportunity costs of not investing the money 
> spent on the child, or college costs. There are estimates that raising 
> a child to age 22, including college, would about triple the cost, to
about $900,000.
>
> With few job prospects and high levels of student loans -- 55 percent 
> of the
> 2010 graduates of four-year public institutions left school with debt 
> averaging $22,000 -- many young people are disillusioned. The average 
> real debt for new graduates rose 24 percent from 2000 through 2010. 
> And about a third of those who are employed take jobs that don't 
> require a four-year degree.
>
> Liberal Arts
>
> Most thought that a bachelor's degree was the ticket to a well-paid 
> job, and that the heavy student loans were worth it and manageable. 
> And many thought that majors such as social science, education, 
> criminal justice or humanities would still get them jobs. They didn't 
> realize that the jobs that could be obtained with such credentials 
> were the nice-to-have but nonessential positions of the boom years 
> that would disappear when times got tough and businesses slashed costs.
>
> Some of those recent graduates probably didn't want to do, or were 
> intellectually incapable of doing, the hard work required to major in 
> science and engineering. After all, afternoon labs cut into athletic 
> pursuits and social time. Yet that's where the jobs are now. Many 
> U.S.-based companies are moving their research-and-development 
> operations offshore because of the lack of scientists and engineers in 
> this country, either native or foreign-born.
>
> For 34- to 49-year-olds, student debt has leaped 40 percent in the 
> past three years, more than for any other age group. Many of those 
> debtors were unemployed and succumbed to for-profit school ads that 
> promised high-paying jobs for graduates. But those jobs seldom 
> materialized, while the student debt remained.
>
> Moreover, many college graduates are ill-prepared for almost any job. 
> A study by the Pew Charitable Trusts examined the abilities of U.S. 
> college graduates in three areas: analyzing news stories, 
> understanding documents and possessing the math proficiency to handle 
> tasks such as balancing a checkbook or tipping in a restaurant.
>
> The results were deplorable. Half the graduates of four- year colleges 
> and three-quarters of those from two-year institutions lacked the 
> skills to understand credit-card offers. They also couldn't interpret 
> tables relating exercise to blood pressure or understand
newspaper-editorial arguments.
>
> And what's expected of students at all levels has been dumbed down 
> tremendously in recent decades. Perfect scores on SATs used to be 
> unheard of. Now they're routine.
>
> Furthermore, the best graduate students in the top universities are 
> often foreigners. And they come from countries that have much cheaper 
> education systems. Yet American 15-year- olds rank in the middle of 
> the pack in math, reading and science scores, and their high-school 
> graduation rates are below international averages.
>
> Education Standards
>
> As higher-education quantity has soared, quality has dropped. Many 
> institutions are mere diploma mills, graduating students of limited 
> capability. Wall Street companies and management consultants fawn over 
> MBAs from Stanford and Harvard, but won't even interview the legions 
> of night-school MBAs, who were taught by poorly paid adjunct 
> professors at lesser institutions.
>
> The realization that many recent college graduates were poorly 
> prepared for nonexistent jobs, that they will be burdened for years 
> with crushing student loans along with the resulting frustration, may 
> be bringing about a great
> revelation: Going to college doesn't make you smart and ready for a 
> good, well-paid job. There's little causal relationship between going 
> to college and financial success despite the statistical link. And you 
> can't prove causality with statistics.
>
> Indeed, causality probably runs the other way. Today, most smart 
> people go to college, especially as the top institutions beat the 
> bushes for able, but disadvantaged, students with brains who lack legacy
or other connections.
> But bright people would be successful without college, as was common 
> before the days when a degree became almost mandatory. This direction 
> of causality is also suggested by the high dropout rates of low- 
> income students, who often lack the intellectual preparation for 
> college. Furthermore, those who demonstrate the brains needed for 
> college while in high school usually enter four-year institutions and
graduate.
>
> A minimum of a bachelor's degree is needed to be considered for a 
> decent job; it's the initial screen used by most employers. And, of 
> course, employers generally are assured that top school graduates have 
> the best prospects for success -- whether it's because those 
> institutions do a great job at education or because they attract the 
> cream of the crop. At the same time, so many people graduate from 
> college that even bartenders have degrees. Did the chemistry courses 
> teach them how to mix martinis? The money spent on people who don't 
> require more than a high-school diploma for their jobs is wasted, as is
their time in college.
>
> Vocational Training
>
> If it becomes widely apparent that college doesn't make people smart, 
> high-school students will probably be much more efficiently directed 
> to institutions that match their capabilities. Those with high IQs, 
> grades and test scores will be encouraged to attend four-year colleges 
> and universities. Those in the middle will be guided to community 
> colleges with the option of transferring to four-year institutions if 
> they do well. And less-able students will be channeled toward 
> vocational training for occupations that suit them and often pay very
well.
>
> Employers could encourage the rationalization of post- secondary 
> education to match ability with the proper educational and training 
> institutions by making it clear that a college or graduate degree by 
> itself doesn't cut much ice. Those who don't come from credible 
> institutions or can't pass rigorous tests need not apply. This would 
> discourage many from spending their time and money on worthless 
> degrees and encourage them to pursue more fruitful education and training.
>
> Just consider the demand for carpenters, plumbers, electricians and 
> mechanics, and the high pay they now command, even in this weak economy.
> Community colleges with two-year courses in technical specialties are 
> training people for these jobs and for manufacturing positions such as 
> machinists, robotics specialists and other highly skilled trades. An 
> estimated 600,000 skilled middle-class manufacturing jobs remain 
> unfilled nationwide, even as millions of Americans are still 
> unemployed. German companies with operations in the U.S. such as 
> Siemens AG, Bayerische Motoren Werke AG and Robert Bosch GmbH are
transferring their nation's system here.
> It involves apprentice programs in partnerships with technical schools.
>
> The student-loan glut is depressing college financing, but so too are 
> other woes unleashed by the recession. With high unemployment, 
> depressed incomes, still-reduced investment portfolios and collapsed 
> house prices, alumni giving is under pressure. And it is likely to 
> remain so in the
> slow-economic- growth atmosphere of deleveraging that will probably 
> take another five to seven years to complete.
>
> The financial status of students' parents will remain troubled for the 
> same reasons. Many, as they approach retirement, will confront vastly 
> inadequate savings and need to save for their own well-being, as well 
> as to help finance their kids' educations.Home equity used to be 
> available to fund children's college tuition, but no more.
>
> Declining Appeal
>
> In 2010, one-third of parents surveyed by the education- lender Sallie 
> Mae strongly agreed that children should attend college for the 
> experience, regardless of the effect on their potential earnings. In 
> 2011, that number slipped to 24 percent.
>
> Most college endowments have recovered from the huge losses of 2008, 
> but remain more cautious, with weaker gains likely in future years. 
> They are now prepared for lower returns as they emphasize dividends, 
> investment-grade bond interest and other here-and-now income rather 
> than pie-in-the-sky capital gains.
>
> According to a new study by student-loan provider Sallie Mae (SLM), 
> grants and scholarships fell 15 percent in the 2011-2012 academic year 
> to $6,077 on average from $7,124 in 2010-2011. This category includes 
> money from colleges as well as scholarships from other institutions 
> and federal funding such as Pell grants.
>
> State governments, hard-pressed by persistent budget deficits and 
> vastly underfunded pension plans, are cutting costs, including aid to 
> state colleges and universities. After decades of growth, state 
> funding for higher education has fallen 15 percent since 2008, 
> adjusted for inflation. Federal funding for university research is also
declining.
>
> Responses to the crisis in higher-education financing are developing 
> and varied. Some institutions are raising tuition. Some are 
> reorienting their programs away from the liberal arts and toward training
for careers.
>
> While some institutions are considering tuition freezes as a way of 
> containing costs, the University of the South known as Sewanee, has 
> gone even further. Last February, Sewanee cut tuition and fees for the 
> 2011-2012 academic year by 10 percent. Last November, the school 
> announced that for current students, costs for the 2012-2013 year were 
> frozen at $41,518. Then in January of this year, the university froze 
> the annual costs for incoming freshmen in 2012 at $44,630 for four years,
or through the spring of 2016.
>
> Sewanee Experiment
>
> Sewanee wants to address the spiraling costs of higher education, the 
> lingering effects of the recession and the siphoning-off of prospects 
> by state schools where student costs are rising in many cases due to 
> cuts in state funding, even though costs remain lower than at private 
> colleges. The tuition cut and freezes also reduce the pressure to buy 
> attractive students with merit scholarships and help Sewanee compete 
> with other private schools, where tuition and fees continue to rise 
> much faster than the consumer price index. Sewanee now plans to
concentrate its financial aid on needy students.
>
> The marketplace has responded very positively to these actions. 
> Applications for this fall have risen 15 percent from last year, and 
> the quality of applicants has improved. The entering freshman class in 
> 2011 numbered 433, up from 401 in 2010.
>
> The school has also become more selective, offering admission to 56 
> percent, compared with 60 percent earlier. It will be interesting to 
> see if other colleges follow Sewanee's lead.
>
> (A. Gary Shilling is president of A. Gary Shilling & Co. and author of 
> "The Age of Deleveraging: Investment Strategies for a Decade of Slow 
> Growth and Deflation." The opinions expressed are his own. This is the 
> second in a two-part series.)
>
>
>
> Keith Hudson, Saltford, England http://allisstatus.wordpress.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to