Things over people.   It's interesting that in the "Art of Loving" by Erich
Fromm there was another hope.    However my experience at the seminary is
that Fromm was an aberration.    It's all about cash and blood.   

 

There is, however a groundswell.   

 

Beneath all of this entitlement there are thousands of great thinkers and
artists who are of the same religion, who have learned humanism from their
Art and philosophy from Engineering.   A cold connection to logic and
awareness of difficulty not being external but being mere incompetence in
the children of affluence.   (As for the offspring of affluence, think of
the people who went after Obama as a Nazi and you will get the type of
thinking that I mean.)    

 

The Foundation is that it's not the name but the deed.     To merely call a
name is really a "curse."    Say it four times an you practicing witchcraft.
Good theory and strong methodology are both subverted by a poor foundation
and an awareness of the abstract processes lying beneath the theory and
methods.    If you are going to be a part of a performance process then the
name is irrelevant.    The curse is returned to the sender.     

 

You have to have a foundation.    It matters what you do on stage and
whether your audience is prepared for you.    If they are not your
competence is irrelevant.     If they are and you are under prepared and
poorly conceptualized you will miss the boat.

 

Today we are on a hero's journey in the theory of economics.     The hyper
individual.   I remember the hyper individual as "blut uber alles" and
"arbeit mach frei."     The Yonega governments still follow those old ethnic
rules that we fought to divest ourselves of in WWII.     But once they won
the war, they brought them back themselves.    No one says anymore that a
perpetual war is a failure of religion because they know nothing of the
purpose of the religion and are used to it's being practiced miserably.     

 

For me, religion is the pure concern with transcendent reality.   Everyone
has an Ultimate Concern and everyone believes in the future so they have
some sense of transcendence.   To say that they have no God is to say that
they have no core reality and no sense of a future or hope.     I don't care
what you call it but if you don't have balance in your life, you are in
great danger from yourself. 

 

Labor is not a thing.   A lump.    Labor is people.   Civilization happens
for the development of human capital and the evolution of spirit.    Labor
is just a word brought by someone who struggled at math and tried to relate
it to the whole of reality as the only abstraction.     It's a good tool but
you never hear these folks using the musical score for their math.    And
yet philosophers point to the musical score as a superior literary system
for aural abstractions to math.   Actually I'm just quoting people I've read
who know more math than I do.   I suspect Einstein had the best idea.   Do
both.   For some it's rhythm.  Some of the world's greatest physicists were
percussionists in their spare time.    Moving two tempos at once in two
different drums makes relativity practical.    Powwow drummers have been
doing it for thousands of years with four people on one drum.    Metronome
makers did it for Beethoven who couldn't  do it.    Brahms and Chopin
developed whole methods to teach it to the mono-rhythmic Europeans.    

 

Like Spielberg said:  It will take a close encounter with a musical alien to
get the human race to open their ears and they will do it only because they
are afraid of people who sing and play the organ as they escape the
boundaries of the Universe. 

 

REH

 

 

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of michael gurstein
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 12:14 PM
To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
Subject: Re: [Futurework] NYTimes.com: Robot Makers Spread Global Gospelof
Automation

 

Well at one point having owned/operated a parking lot I can tell you that
not having an extra pair of hands between the cash and the accounts probably
adds 30% or more to the revenues realized. (The folks working the parking
lots I was familiar with were all displaced professionals from one war torn
country or another and weren't by any means intellectually deprived--they
were however, being thwarted by Canadian credentialing systems that didn't
acknowledge their quite considerable expertise and training.

 

M

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Cordell
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 9:08 AM
To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
Subject: Re: [Futurework] NYTimes.com: Robot Makers Spread Global Gospelof
Automation

 

Also lost when machines replaced "guys" is another pair of eyes and ears
that not only collected money but also kept a look out on events on and off
the lot.  The latter function is slowly being replaced by security cameras.
Cameras can catch the images and store them, a person can see what is going
on and help a person or perhaps deter or stop a crime in progress.

 

Arthur

 

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Weick
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 11:39 AM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] NYTimes.com: Robot Makers Spread Global Gospelof
Automation

 

Nevertheless, I feel sorry for the guys that have been replaced by machines
when you drive in and out of parking lots.  But I guess it serves them right
for not being smart enough to get better jobs?

 

Ed

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Sally Lerner <mailto:[email protected]>  

To: Arthur Cordell <mailto:[email protected]>  ; 'RE-DESIGNING WORK,
INCOMEDISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION' <mailto:[email protected]>  

Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 9:38 AM

Subject: Re: [Futurework] NYTimes.com: Robot Makers Spread Global Gospelof
Automation

 

Just to go on record, I share Arthur's positive response to  automation (why
should people do 

dumb, dirty or dangerous work that can be done by machines? -
science-fiction fears aside) and

also his conviction that many social changes - not least in education and
distribution of "goods" -

will be needed to ensure the equitable spread of benefits.  Believe it or
not, these issues were

at the core of Futurework's  genesis.

 

Sally 


  _____  


From: Arthur Cordell [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 8:12 PM
To: Sally Lerner; 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
Subject: RE: [Futurework] NYTimes.com: Robot Makers Spread Global Gospel of
Automation

The jobs gained (quality and quantity) will be very different than the jobs
lost.

 

Cars are rated in horsepower since that is what they replaced; computers
rated in memory since to some degree that is what they replace...very
broadly speaking.

 

Arthur

 

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of lerner
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 1:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Futurework] NYTimes.com: Robot Makers Spread Global Gospel of
Automation

 



Well, it could go either way? Sally 


 


Sent by [email protected]:

  <http://i1.nyt.com/images/misc/nytlogo194x27.gif> 



 
<https://www.nytimes.com/images/2013/01/24/business/ALTROBOT/ALTROBOT-thumbS
tandard-v2.jpg> 


 
<http://p.nytimes.com/email/re?location=InCMR7g4BCKrqV4D0maRnwaaECN6Xe2r&use
r_id=2fa0776a7d2e523304196dad6be5dfba&email_type=eta&task_id=135905175555918
> Robot Makers Spread Global Gospel of Automation 


By JOHN MARKOFF


Manufacturers of robots and similar machines gathered in Chicago, casting
automation as an indispensable engine of economic growth.


Or, copy and paste this URL into your browser:
<http://p.nytimes.com/email/re?location=InCMR7g4BCKrqV4D0maRnwaaECN6Xe2r&use
r_id=2fa0776a7d2e523304196dad6be5dfba&email_type=eta&task_id=135905175555918
> http://nyti.ms/WnHr4r 

        

To ensure delivery to your inbox, please add  <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected] to your address book.


Advertisement


article tools sponsored by

 
<http://www.nytimes.com/adx/bin/adx_click.html?type=goto&opzn&page=secure.ny
times.com/mem/emailthis.html&pos=Frame6A&sn2=6da5bd5a/78e3a264&sn1=cf77b99a/
973f433f&camp=FSL2013_ArticleTools_336x90_1849313d_nyt5&ad=TheEast_336x90_Ja
n23&goto=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Efoxsearchlight%2Ecom%2Ftheeast> 


 
<http://p.nytimes.com/email/re?location=4z5Q7LhI+KVBjmEgFdYACMlEhIhWVuPIxgan
fKahJGpDcKtdpfztygRnz23j1z6nDpx4eAAqQbYRMMl5L56EeQ==&user_id=2fa0776a7d2e523
304196dad6be5dfba&email_type=eta&task_id=135905175555918> Copyright 2012 |
The New York Times Company
<http://p.nytimes.com/email/re?location=4z5Q7LhI+KUv6vqdu/zT/DtUzLlQEcSh&use
r_id=2fa0776a7d2e523304196dad6be5dfba&email_type=eta&task_id=135905175555918
>  | NYTimes.com 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018 

 
<http://p.nytimes.com/email/re?location=hdaNaYedr2/IomeWRKt0nffrak8aSGLbvtkk
q/r7ihwOf5XePlpJ1w==&user_id=2fa0776a7d2e523304196dad6be5dfba&email_type=eta
&task_id=135905175555918> 

  _____  

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to