Yes, or maybe slug.

-Pete

On Sun, 10 Mar 2013, Ray Harrell wrote:

> gecko?
> 
> REH
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of pete
> Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 11:07 PM
> To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
> Subject: Re: [Futurework] FW: New robots in the workplace: Job creators or
> job terminators?
> 
> 
> Grrr. People being sloppy. "a spider-like robot that climbs and maintains
> wind turbines". Really?
> 
> No. From a single reporter's story, archived at gizmodo but only it seems on
> .com.au and .co.uk, we have an article from nine months ago about a
> "spiderman-like" wall climbing robot. There is nothing spider, or indeed
> spiderman -like about this robot except the reporter, who, it turns out,
> seems to have a thing about spiderman, and like Jane Siberry's dog,
> everything reminds her of spiderman, as becomes evident if you google
> "leslie horn" 
> and "spiderman". 
> 
> So some hack reads this, without digging further, and truncates spiderman to
> spider for the current article. In fact, the robot is described and pictured
> in the original press release from GE, which Ms Horn's Gizmodo article links
> to, here:
> 
> http://www.gereports.com/go-go-gadget/
> 
> and the word "spider" is conspicuous by its absense. The robot has soft
> flexible caterpillar treads, which surround it forming a soft seal, and a
> vacuum motor pulls a vacuum in the space thus formed under the robot's
> "belly". It relies on a relatively smooth surface and an umbilical to power
> the pump. Oh, yes, and this robot does not "maintain" anything. It uses a
> video camera to do inspections. A modded version may use radar to ping the
> blades for defects, but it has no capacity to do any sort of repair.
> 
> Another example of the wretched quality of modern reporting, where a
> sensational lie seems to always be preferred to the truth when it can garner
> more eyes, and thus more pennies, for the website.
> 
>  -Pete
> 
> 
> 
> > From: Portside labor [[email protected]]
> > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 8:20 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: New robots in the workplace: Job creators or job terminators?
> > 
> > 
> >  <http://portside.org>  <http://portside.org/>  <http://portside.org> 
> > Portside Labor
> >  
> > <http://portside.org/2013-03-08/new-robots-workplace-job-creators-or-j
> > ob-ter
> > minators> New robots in the workplace: Job creators or job terminators? 
> > 
> > Cecilia Kang
> > March 8, 2013
> > Washington Post
> > <http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/new-robots-in-the-w
> > orkpla
> > ce-job-creators-or-job-terminators/2013/03/06/a80b8f34-746c-11e2-8f84-
> > 3e4b51
> > 3b1a13_story.html>
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Today's robots can do far more than their primitive, single-task
> ancestors.
> > And there is a broad debate among economists, labor experts and 
> > companies over whether the trend will add good-paying jobs to the 
> > economy by helping firms run more efficiently or simply leave human
> workers out in the cold.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > BOSTON - At MIT, a management robot is learning to run a factory and 
> > give orders to artificial co-workers, and a BakeBot robot is reading 
> > recipes, whipping together butter, sugar and flour and putting the 
> > cookie mix in the oven. At the University of California at Berkeley, a 
> > robot can do laundry and then neatly fold -T-shirts and towels.
> > 
> > A wave of new robots, affordable and capable of accomplishing advanced 
> > human tasks, is being aimed at jobs that are high in the workforce
> hierarchy.
> > 
> > The consequences of this leap in technology loom large for the 
> > American worker - and perhaps their managers, too. Back in the 1980s, 
> > when automated spray-painting and welding machines took hold in 
> > factories, some on the assembly line quickly discovered they had become
> obsolete.
> > 
> > Today's robots can do far more than their primitive, single-task
> ancestors.
> > And there is a broad debate among economists, labor experts and 
> > companies over whether the trend will add good-paying jobs to the 
> > economy by helping firms run more efficiently or simply leave human
> workers out in the cold.
> and maintain> 
> >  "We've reached a tipping point in robotics," said Daniela Rus, 
> > director of MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence 
> > Laboratory. The possibility is to run a factory, she added, "all while you
> are sleeping."
> > 
> > U.S. firms have already begun deploying some of these newer robots. 
> > General Electric has developed spiderlike robots to climb and maintain 
> > tall wind turbines. Kiva Systems, a company bought by Amazon.com, has 
> > orange ottoman-shaped robots that sweep across warehouse floors, pull 
> > products off shelves and deliver them for packaging. Some hospitals 
> > have begun employing robots that can move room to room to dispense 
> > medicines to patients or deliver the advice of a doctor who is not on
> site.
> > 
> > Many companies see such automation as the key to cutting costs and 
> > staying competitive. Sales of industrial robots rose 38 percent 
> > between 2010 and
> > 2012 and are poised to bring in record revenue this year, according to 
> > industry analyst Dan Kara.
> > 
> > CLICK HERE TO VIEW COMPLETE ARTICLE
> > <http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/new-robots-in-the-w
> > orkpla
> > ce-job-creators-or-job-terminators/2013/03/06/a80b8f34-746c-11e2-8f84-
> > 3e4b51
> > 3b1a13_print.html>
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > <http://portside.org/2013-03-08/new-robots-workplace-job-creators-or-j
> > ob-ter
> > minators> VIEW ONLINE
> >  <http://portside.org/print/node/1959> PRINT  
> > <http://portside.org/subscribe> SUBSCRIBE  <http://portside.org> VISIT 
> > PORTSIDE.ORG  <https://twitter.com/portsideorg> TWITTER  
> > <https://facebook.com/Portside.PortsideLabor> FACEBOOK
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Portside aims to provide material of interest to people on the left 
> > that will help them to interpret the world and to change it.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >  <http://portside.org/submit> Submit via web
> > 
> >  <mailto:[email protected]> Submit via email
> > 
> >  <http://portside.org/faq> Frequenty asked questions
> > 
> >  <http://portside.org/subscribe> Manage subscription
> > 
> >  <http://portside.org/archive> Search Portside archives
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >             
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > To unsubscribe, click here
> > <http://lists.portside.org/cgi-bin/listserv/wa?TICKET=NzM0OTY1IGxlcm5l
> > ckBVV0 FURVJMT08uQ0EgUE9SVFNJREVMQUJPUk/o8EbTH3pK&c=SIGNOFF> .
> > 
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to