Wasn't the Gecko the model for velcro at NASA?

REH

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of pete
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2013 11:22 PM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] FW: New robots in the workplace: Job creators or
job terminators?


Yes, or maybe slug.

-Pete

On Sun, 10 Mar 2013, Ray Harrell wrote:

> gecko?
> 
> REH
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of pete
> Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 11:07 PM
> To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
> Subject: Re: [Futurework] FW: New robots in the workplace: Job 
> creators or job terminators?
> 
> 
> Grrr. People being sloppy. "a spider-like robot that climbs and 
> maintains wind turbines". Really?
> 
> No. From a single reporter's story, archived at gizmodo but only it 
> seems on .com.au and .co.uk, we have an article from nine months ago 
> about a "spiderman-like" wall climbing robot. There is nothing spider, 
> or indeed spiderman -like about this robot except the reporter, who, 
> it turns out, seems to have a thing about spiderman, and like Jane 
> Siberry's dog, everything reminds her of spiderman, as becomes evident 
> if you google "leslie horn"
> and "spiderman". 
> 
> So some hack reads this, without digging further, and truncates 
> spiderman to spider for the current article. In fact, the robot is 
> described and pictured in the original press release from GE, which Ms 
> Horn's Gizmodo article links to, here:
> 
> http://www.gereports.com/go-go-gadget/
> 
> and the word "spider" is conspicuous by its absense. The robot has 
> soft flexible caterpillar treads, which surround it forming a soft 
> seal, and a vacuum motor pulls a vacuum in the space thus formed under 
> the robot's "belly". It relies on a relatively smooth surface and an 
> umbilical to power the pump. Oh, yes, and this robot does not 
> "maintain" anything. It uses a video camera to do inspections. A 
> modded version may use radar to ping the blades for defects, but it has no
capacity to do any sort of repair.
> 
> Another example of the wretched quality of modern reporting, where a 
> sensational lie seems to always be preferred to the truth when it can 
> garner more eyes, and thus more pennies, for the website.
> 
>  -Pete
> 
> 
> 
> > From: Portside labor [[email protected]]
> > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 8:20 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: New robots in the workplace: Job creators or job terminators?
> > 
> > 
> >  <http://portside.org>  <http://portside.org/>  
> > <http://portside.org> Portside Labor
> >  
> > <http://portside.org/2013-03-08/new-robots-workplace-job-creators-or
> > -j
> > ob-ter
> > minators> New robots in the workplace: Job creators or job terminators? 
> > 
> > Cecilia Kang
> > March 8, 2013
> > Washington Post
> > <http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/new-robots-in-the
> > -w
> > orkpla
> > ce-job-creators-or-job-terminators/2013/03/06/a80b8f34-746c-11e2-8f8
> > 4-
> > 3e4b51
> > 3b1a13_story.html>
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Today's robots can do far more than their primitive, single-task
> ancestors.
> > And there is a broad debate among economists, labor experts and 
> > companies over whether the trend will add good-paying jobs to the 
> > economy by helping firms run more efficiently or simply leave human
> workers out in the cold.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > BOSTON - At MIT, a management robot is learning to run a factory and 
> > give orders to artificial co-workers, and a BakeBot robot is reading 
> > recipes, whipping together butter, sugar and flour and putting the 
> > cookie mix in the oven. At the University of California at Berkeley, 
> > a robot can do laundry and then neatly fold -T-shirts and towels.
> > 
> > A wave of new robots, affordable and capable of accomplishing 
> > advanced human tasks, is being aimed at jobs that are high in the 
> > workforce
> hierarchy.
> > 
> > The consequences of this leap in technology loom large for the 
> > American worker - and perhaps their managers, too. Back in the 
> > 1980s, when automated spray-painting and welding machines took hold 
> > in factories, some on the assembly line quickly discovered they had 
> > become
> obsolete.
> > 
> > Today's robots can do far more than their primitive, single-task
> ancestors.
> > And there is a broad debate among economists, labor experts and 
> > companies over whether the trend will add good-paying jobs to the 
> > economy by helping firms run more efficiently or simply leave human
> workers out in the cold.
> and maintain>
> >  "We've reached a tipping point in robotics," said Daniela Rus, 
> > director of MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence 
> > Laboratory. The possibility is to run a factory, she added, "all 
> > while you
> are sleeping."
> > 
> > U.S. firms have already begun deploying some of these newer robots. 
> > General Electric has developed spiderlike robots to climb and 
> > maintain tall wind turbines. Kiva Systems, a company bought by 
> > Amazon.com, has orange ottoman-shaped robots that sweep across 
> > warehouse floors, pull products off shelves and deliver them for 
> > packaging. Some hospitals have begun employing robots that can move 
> > room to room to dispense medicines to patients or deliver the advice 
> > of a doctor who is not on
> site.
> > 
> > Many companies see such automation as the key to cutting costs and 
> > staying competitive. Sales of industrial robots rose 38 percent 
> > between 2010 and
> > 2012 and are poised to bring in record revenue this year, according 
> > to industry analyst Dan Kara.
> > 
> > CLICK HERE TO VIEW COMPLETE ARTICLE
> > <http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/new-robots-in-the
> > -w
> > orkpla
> > ce-job-creators-or-job-terminators/2013/03/06/a80b8f34-746c-11e2-8f8
> > 4-
> > 3e4b51
> > 3b1a13_print.html>
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > <http://portside.org/2013-03-08/new-robots-workplace-job-creators-or
> > -j
> > ob-ter
> > minators> VIEW ONLINE
> >  <http://portside.org/print/node/1959> PRINT 
> > <http://portside.org/subscribe> SUBSCRIBE  <http://portside.org> 
> > VISIT PORTSIDE.ORG  <https://twitter.com/portsideorg> TWITTER 
> > <https://facebook.com/Portside.PortsideLabor> FACEBOOK
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Portside aims to provide material of interest to people on the left 
> > that will help them to interpret the world and to change it.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >  <http://portside.org/submit> Submit via web
> > 
> >  <mailto:[email protected]> Submit via email
> > 
> >  <http://portside.org/faq> Frequenty asked questions
> > 
> >  <http://portside.org/subscribe> Manage subscription
> > 
> >  <http://portside.org/archive> Search Portside archives
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >             
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > To unsubscribe, click here
> > <http://lists.portside.org/cgi-bin/listserv/wa?TICKET=NzM0OTY1IGxlcm
> > 5l
> > ckBVV0 FURVJMT08uQ0EgUE9SVFNJREVMQUJPUk/o8EbTH3pK&c=SIGNOFF> .
> > 
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to