Hi Ray,

At 13:08 05/01/02 -0500, you wrote:
>Keith,
>
>A further aside on this is that the Chinese are using John Warfield much the
>same way as Japan used Edward Deming.

M'mm . . . many years ago a good friend of mine (also a Ray, strangely
enough) at the Open University tried to get an honorary doctorate for
Deming. As a quality control manager in industry at the time I entirely
approved, of course, but not being a member of his Senate I couldn't help.
There's no doubt that Deming made a significant contribution to Japanese
industry.

>Both Deming and Warfield are
>Americans who were basically ignored by American Corporate management until
>they met them on the field of international trade and got their bottoms
>spanked.    John Warfield is the finest pedagogist and systems thinker I
>have ever had the pleasure of reading or meeting.    He made me believe
>again in the possibilities of science and that was not an easy job
>considering all of the fraud around.   He even made me reconsider Pierce and
>Hayak when the Neo-Cons has almost destroyed any ability for me to separate
>their work from the Neo-con abuse of their ideas.

Cor!  If Warfield could convince you that there's a lot of good stuff in
Hayek, then he must be good!  But I don't know the fella. Can you give me a
reference?

Best wishes,

Keith  
__________________________________________________________
�Writers used to write because they had something to say; now they write in
order to discover if they have something to say.� John D. Barrow
_________________________________________________
Keith Hudson, Bath, England;  e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________

Reply via email to