Ray,

On the other hand:

The turtle lives 'tween plated decks
Which practically conceals its sex.
I think it clever of the turtle
In such a fix to be so fertile

Harry
______________________________________

Ray wrote:

>Congratulations Harry,
>
>You did it.    You got everyone to discuss the Platonic/Aristotilian double
>bind with no one finding their way out becouse there is none as long as they
>agree to your rules.   You have them trapped in a cave just as their
>attitudes and lives in business and economics have trapped them.   I will
>give you Ogden Nash as your answer and I figure not to steal your learning
>but explaining:    "A cow is of a bovine ilk, one end is moo the other
>milk."
>
>Now for something else.    Population:   Capitalism doesn't put limits on
>the market so therefore it must put limits on resource loss by creating a
>two tier system with the upper tier being so small that they use very little
>even at their wildest and most extravagant.   That plays havoc with
>population because the revenge of the lower classes is to breed the upper
>classes out of existance.    Like those human waves the Chinese put out to
>counter America's superior fire power in the Korean War.   Capitalism
>demands the freedom of Democracy but is against the principle of equality.
>Heard it before?    Well, I have to go to ceremony now and had to get rid of
>some of this.
>
>We say there are four choices in life.   1.  you choose your God (Your
>Ultimate Concern)   2.  You choose your life partner,   3.  You choose your
>work and 4.  You choose your play.
>
>I go to celebrate my God today.    Have a good time playing boys.
>
>Ray
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Harry Pollard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Dennis Paull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 3:35 AM
>Subject: Re: Three basic realms
>
>
> > Dennis wrote:
> >
> > >Hi Keith, Harry, Arthur et al,
> > >
> > >I beg to differ with axiom 1.
> > >
> > >I believe that there are some people whose desires are unlimited
> > >and others who are more content with what they have. There is a
> > >continuum in this respect. If everyone's desires were unlimited
> > >we would be continually at war and this is clearly not the case.
> >
> > That's a large jump. Why do you think that "unlimited desires"
> > means that we would be continually at war? I would think that
> > your "content" friend would anxiously desire peace so his
> > contentment is uninterrupted.
> >
> > I assume too that though he has eaten today, he will desire to eat
> > tomorrow and take the necessary steps.
> >
> > >True, some folks realize that acting on their desires can lead to
> > >bad results. And others may have only altruistic desires. To
> > >draw conclusions from your axiom may be very difficult due to
> > >the great variance in what those desires are in individual cases.
> >
> > You'll recall that I said that after people have satisfied the very
> > basic desires (survival) , their desires can take off in any direction.
> >
> > I also said we don't know what their desires may be, though we
> > can deduce some of them by their actions. Actually people can be
> > very skillful at knowing what another's desires may be.
> >
> > However, that isn't our concern. All we need to know is that a person's
> > desires are unlimited.
> >
> > >DENNIS: To draw macro-economic conclusions from a set of individualistic
> > >desires seems unwise. Each person acts from self interest in such
> > >diverse ways. How can we build institutions based on such a broad
> > >and shifting foundation.
> >
> > Who drew macro-economic conclusions? I certainly didn't, so it
> > must be you.
> >
> > On the other hand I would ask why do we want to build institutions?
> >
> > If we do, perhaps we should try to understand the building blocks of
> > institutions before we build them.
> >
> > >DENNIS: Perhaps I am saying that although axiom may be true, so what!
> > >It may not be a useful concept.
> >
> > Well, right away, it shows that involuntary unemployment is impossible.
> >
> > That should be of interest to FutureWorkers. If we all worked 24 hours
> > a day, seven says a week, we couldn't satisfy the unlimited desires of all
> > of us.
> >
> > So our question must change from "How do we find people work?" to
> > "Why are people without work?"
> >
> > If we come up with the right question, we may get the right answer.
> >
> > We might also wonder why we are trying to find work for "least
> > exertion" people - people who sensibly are trying to reduce the work
> > necessary to satisfy their desires.
> >
> > Most important, with these two assumptions about people, we begin the
> > study of Man by putting to one side the assumptions we have previously
> > made that Man is unpredictable, violent, and a willing customer of the
> > seven deadly sins.
> >
> > Oh, and Dennis, #2 - the least exertion principle - is perhaps his easiest
> > way to satisfy more of those unsatisfiable desires.
> >
> > >I do buy into axioms 2 through 4 however.
> > >
> > >Dennis Paull
> > >
> > >At 01:00 AM 3/15/2002 Friday , Keith wrote:
> > > >Hi Harry,
> > > >
> > > >Before pushing off for a short holiday break I suggested that a third
>axiom
> > > >could be added to Harry Pollard's basic two:
> > > >
> > > >1. People's desires are unlimited
> > > >2. People seek to satisfy their desires with the least exertion
> > > >3. People have a curiosity beyond present needs for survival
> > > >
> > > >Then Arthur Cordell came up with a fourth:
> > > >
> > > >(AC)
> > > >>>>>
> > > >How about a fourth?  Humans are meaning seeking creatures.  We are
> > > >taxonomists.  One of the ways in which we find meaning is to order and
> > > >label things.  Another way in which we find meaning is to "discover"
> > > >self-evident truths.  A sort of  benchmarking.  A way of providing
>building
> > > >blocks for whatever intellectual edifice we are seeking to build.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >
> > > >. . . which could be summarised as:
> > > >
> > > > 4. Humans are meaning-seeking creatures.
> > > >
> > >[snip]


******************************
Harry Pollard
Henry George School of LA
Box 655
Tujunga  CA  91042
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: (818) 352-4141
Fax: (818) 353-2242
*******************************



Reply via email to