I'll not take your rotten bait. (it's been the same for years, hence too mouldy to entertain)
I'll not bore the list with the more reams of scientific consensus re overpop. (I've given dozens of links already. If anyone has questions, email me offlist.)I DO defer to specialists just like Harry does when he gets advice on his health. Perhaps if he didn't place his verbosity above all other on the planet, one might be able to have a meaningful discussion with him.
Re Harry's "exertion" sophistry, note that he makes claims for ALL humans, while using only HIS evaluation of laziness. When was the last time you worked out in a gym, Harry? Training involves extending oneself to improve strength, flexibility and stamina. You're missing a large chunk of life, I'm afraid. And note that runners (& cyclists, & x-c skiers, etc) frequently run for an exertion HIGH. And note that you TOTALLY AVOIDED the ARTIST, MUSICIAN, ACTOR efforts. Nothing like one dimension thinking; but I shouldn't be surprised as thet seems to be the usual economist method.
Go ahead and expound, Harry. Nobody cares. And I'll not reply again to your introspections on these matters. I wish that there was mandatory voting by listmembers to put pompous certitude in its place.
Steve
-- http://magma.ca/~gpco/ http://www.scientists4pr.org/ Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist.—Kenneth Boulding
