What I have trouble figuring out is why the US singles out Iraq on grounds of being controlled by a madman who may have weapons of mass destruction. Iraq is not the only volatile place where weapons of mass destruction may exist. And there are plenty of madmen in present or potential positions of power. After George Bush "gits" Sadam, will he then proceed to stamp out the other madmen one by one? For each madman he stamps out, might not another one (or more) emerge to take his place?
Ed Ed Weick 577 Melbourne Ave. Ottawa, ON, K2A 1W7 Canada Phone (613) 728 4630 Fax (613) 728 9382
