What about the old "Oedipal" explanation? Son kills the father. Bush Sr couldn't take out Saddam, so Bush Jr is going to do it and thus replace the father and become the father.
Jr will thus win mommy's love away from the father (and be able to crawl back in the womb again???) Yours from "beyond the basic rule" \brad mccormick Stan Bernstein wrote: > > See "Overthrowing Saddam 'just the first step' > http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/09/11/1031608248668.html > > On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Ed Weick wrote: > > > What I have trouble figuring out is why the US singles out Iraq on grounds > > of being controlled by a madman who may have weapons of mass destruction. > > Iraq is not the only volatile place where weapons of mass destruction may > > exist. And there are plenty of madmen in present or potential positions of > > power. After George Bush "gits" Sadam, will he then proceed to stamp out > > the other madmen one by one? For each madman he stamps out, might not > > another one (or more) emerge to take his place? > > > > Ed > > > > Ed Weick > > 577 Melbourne Ave. > > Ottawa, ON, K2A 1W7 > > Canada > > Phone (613) 728 4630 > > Fax (613) 728 9382 > > > > > > -- Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works.... (Matt 5:16) Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. (1 Thes 5:21) <![%THINK;[SGML+APL]]> Brad McCormick, Ed.D. / [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------------------------------------------- Visit my website ==> http://www.users.cloud9.net/~bradmcc/
