Hierarchy doesn't need to be "smuggled back" into whatever type of society
or governance that we may happen to have at any time. Every social mammal
-- and that includes us -- has a hierarchical system. It has evolved
because leadership at crucial moments is essential. The other side of the
coin is that just as we have a perpetual propensity to throw up leadership,
most of the rest of us have a propensity to be credulous and deferential --
particularly at crucial moments.

At its most benign, hierarchy depends on voluntary respect for the skills
of those above us. Also, most importantly, benign hierachy is always
accessible -- easily dethroned when better candidates appear. 

At its worst, heirachy depends on inculcating fear and dependency on the
masses and they are inaccessible. Something like 80 or so dictatorships
around the world are of this nature and some can last for a long time.
Saddam Hussein is an example of such.

Modern democracies are supposedly kept in good condition by the checks and
balances supplied by the supposed independence of government,
administration and the judiciary -- to which has been added in recent
decades, increasingly independent and investigative media, the Net being
the latest of these. 

But even these are insufficient. When the increasingly life-threatening
hole in the ozone layer started opening a couple of decades ago, relevant
scientists and large chemical corporations acted quickly to start cutting
back on CFCs, at least a couple of years before governments could act. Why?
 Not because they were particularly saintly or humanitarian, but because
they had the special expertise to understand the danger and were able to
act on their own before governments could be educated on the matter.

Today, we have too many other problems that can be understood or even acted
upon by the types of nation-state governments we have today. The latter
simply cannot cope any longer with the multiplicity of complex dangers that
are arising. We need a great many more specialised players which can act
independently and laterally across present-day national boundaries when
dangers arise within their purview -- pollution, fishing stocks, potable
water, food, resources, etc. These, too, will inevitably develop their own
hierarchies but, with the limited experience we now have, there's no reason
in principle why each of these should not have accessible hierarchies. 

Keith Hudson

 
At 11:44 04/10/02 -0700, Tom Walker wrote:
>"Brad McCormick, Ed.D. wrote,
>
>> It is my understanding that our concept of "time is money"
>> is a modern idea which was discovered/invented over
>> a millenium -- but I can't find the references at the moment.
>
>Benjamin Franklin, Advice to a Young Tradesman, 1748. Cited by Max Weber as
>the epitome of the capitalist spirit in "The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit
>of Capitalism".
>
>"Remember, that time is money. He that can earn ten shillings a day by his
>labour, and goes abroad, or sits idle, one half of that day, though he
>spends but sixpence during his diversion or idleness, ought not to reckon
>that the only expense; he has really spent, or rather thrown away, five
>shillings besides."
>
>Weber argued that what he termed the protestant ethic was a secularization
>of the notion of a spiritual calling, which under Catholicism denoted a
>hierarchy that placed clergy above the laity in the degree to which they
>were worthy of grace.
>
>One *might* think of it as a democratization as long as one chooses to
>ignore the way that hierarchy is smuggled back into the concept at each
>stage of its secularization. In other words, instead of democratizing grace
>the evolution has simply drained the grace from hierarchy. Amazing. We are
>left with nothing but hierarchy, plain and simple.
>
>Tom Walker
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------

Keith Hudson, General Editor, Handlo Music, http://www.handlo.com
6 Upper Camden Place, Bath BA1 5HX, England
Tel: +44 1225 312622;  Fax: +44 1225 447727; mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to